Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

Did you mean:
lcsh's%3a%22Abstracting %2f problems%2c exercises%2c etc.%22 2
lcsh's%3a%22Abstracting %2f problems%2c exercised%2c etc.%22 2
lcshs%3a%22Abstracting %2f problems%2c exercises%2c etc.%22 2
lcsh's%3a%22Abstracting %2f problems%2c excercises%2c etc.%22 2
lcshs%3a%22Abstracting %2f problems%2c exercised%2c etc.%22 2

Hickey, T.B.; O'Neill, E.T.: FRBRizing OCLC's WorldCat (2004) 0.00
```
0.0048070587 = product of:
  0.024035294 = sum of:
    0.024035294 = product of:
      0.048070587 = sum of:
        0.048070587 = weight(_text_:problems in 5859) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048070587 = score(doc=5859,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15058853 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036484417 = queryNorm
            0.31921813 = fieldWeight in 5859, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5859)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
```
Abstract

The identification of works according to IFLA's report on Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records offers challenges when applied to very large collections of bibliographic records. We describe an algorithm that identifies sets of works and discuss our experience applying the algorithm to OCLC's WorldCat. Four main types of works have been found in our analysis: augmented, revised, aggregate, and translated works. Each of these offers challenges for proper identification and collocation. Quite apart from algorithmic implementation, difficult conceptual problems were encountered in applying the FRBR model to aggregate works.

O'Neill, E.T.: FRBR: Functional requirements for bibliographic records application of the entity-relationship model to Humphry Clinker (2002) 0.00

0.0024715676 = product of:
  0.0123578375 = sum of:
    0.0123578375 = product of:
      0.024715675 = sum of:
        0.024715675 = weight(_text_:22 in 2434) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024715675 = score(doc=2434,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12776221 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036484417 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2434, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2434)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Date: 10. 9.2000 17:38:22