Olson, H.A.; Ward, D.B.: Mundane standards, everyday technologies, equitable access (2003)
0.11
0.108470224 = product of:
0.21694045 = sum of:
0.012015978 = weight(_text_:information in 3959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012015978 = score(doc=3959,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 3959, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3959)
0.20492446 = weight(_text_:standards in 3959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.20492446 = score(doc=3959,freq=14.0), product of:
0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.91199046 = fieldWeight in 3959, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3959)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- The problem of access to marginalized knowledge using general subject access standards is well-established, but few successful solutions have been developed. This paper surveys four different approaches to ameliorating bias: revision of general standards, adaptation of general standards, specialized standards for particular knowledge domains and specialized standards for particular situations. lt then examines their technological alternatives and institutional barriers to solutions. The analysis of standards, technologies and barriers is addressed through Ursula Franklin's interpretation of the real world of technology.
- Source
- Subject retrieval in a networked environment: Proceedings of the IFLA Satellite Meeting held in Dublin, OH, 14-16 August 2001 and sponsored by the IFLA Classification and Indexing Section, the IFLA Information Technology Section and OCLC. Ed.: I.C. McIlwaine