Olson, H.A.; Schlegl, R.: Standardization, objectivity, and user focus : a meta-analysis of subject access critiques (2001)
0.00
0.0020244026 = product of:
0.004048805 = sum of:
0.004048805 = product of:
0.00809761 = sum of:
0.00809761 = weight(_text_:a in 5428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00809761 = score(doc=5428,freq=6.0), product of:
0.06116359 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.053045183 = queryNorm
0.13239266 = fieldWeight in 5428, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5428)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Critiques of subject access standards in LIS literature have addressed biases of gender, sexuality, race, age, ability, ethnicity, language and religion as limits to the representation of diversity and to effective library service for diverse populations. The current study identifies and analyzes this literature as a basis for ameliorating systemic bias and to gather the existing literature for wider accessibility. The study analyzes five quantitative variables: standards discussed, categories of problems, marginalized groups and topics discussed, date, and basis of conclusions (research or experience). Textual analysis reveals that basic tenets of subject access-user-focused cataloguing, objectivity, and standardization-are problematized in the literature and may be the best starting point for future research. In practice, librarians can work to counteract systemic problems in the careful and equitable application of standards and their adaptation to local contexts.
- Type
- a