Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Olson, H.A."
  1. Olson, H.A.: How we construct subjects : a feminist analysis (2007) 0.03
    0.029378314 = sum of:
      0.014546018 = product of:
        0.08727611 = sum of:
          0.08727611 = weight(_text_:back in 5588) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08727611 = score(doc=5588,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.26302487 = queryWeight, product of:
                6.006528 = idf(docFreq=295, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043789834 = queryNorm
              0.33181694 = fieldWeight in 5588, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                6.006528 = idf(docFreq=295, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5588)
        0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
      0.0148322955 = product of:
        0.029664591 = sum of:
          0.029664591 = weight(_text_:22 in 5588) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.029664591 = score(doc=5588,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15334454 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043789834 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5588, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5588)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    To organize information, librarians create structures. These structures grow from a logic that goes back at least as far as Aristotle. It is the basis of classification as we practice it, and thesauri and subject headings have developed from it. Feminist critiques of logic suggest that logic is gendered in nature. This article will explore how these critiques play out in contemporary standards for the organization of information. Our widely used classification schemes embody principles such as hierarchical force that conform to traditional/Aristotelian logic. Our subject heading strings follow a linear path of subdivision. Our thesauri break down subjects into discrete concepts. In thesauri and subject heading lists we privilege hierarchical relationships, reflected in the syndetic structure of broader and narrower terms, over all other relationships. Are our classificatory and syndetic structures gendered? Are there other options? Carol Gilligan's In a Different Voice (1982), Women's Ways of Knowing (Belenky, Clinchy, Goldberger, & Tarule, 1986), and more recent related research suggest a different type of structure for women's knowledge grounded in "connected knowing." This article explores current and potential elements of connected knowing in subject access with a focus on the relationships, both paradigmatic and syntagmatic, between concepts.
    Date
    11.12.2019 19:00:22
  2. Olson, H.A.: Transgressive deconstructions : feminist/postcolonial methodology for research in knowledge organization (2003) 0.01
    0.014391522 = product of:
      0.028783044 = sum of:
        0.028783044 = product of:
          0.057566088 = sum of:
            0.057566088 = weight(_text_:c in 3551) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.057566088 = score(doc=3551,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15104888 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043789834 = queryNorm
                0.381109 = fieldWeight in 3551, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3551)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Tendencias de investigación en organización del conocimient: IV Cologuio International de Ciencas de la Documentación , VI Congreso del Capitulo Espanol de ISKO = Trends in knowledge organization research. Eds.: J.A. Frias u. C. Travieso
  3. Olson, H.A.: Sameness and difference : a cultural foundation of classification (2001) 0.01
    0.010382607 = product of:
      0.020765213 = sum of:
        0.020765213 = product of:
          0.041530427 = sum of:
            0.041530427 = weight(_text_:22 in 166) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041530427 = score(doc=166,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15334454 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043789834 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 166, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=166)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  4. Olson, H.A.; Boll, J.J.: Subject analysis in online catalogs (2001) 0.01
    0.010074065 = product of:
      0.02014813 = sum of:
        0.02014813 = product of:
          0.04029626 = sum of:
            0.04029626 = weight(_text_:c in 6113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04029626 = score(doc=6113,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15104888 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043789834 = queryNorm
                0.2667763 = fieldWeight in 6113, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6113)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Knowledge organization 28(2001) no.4, S.206-208 (C. Arsenault):"Overall, this is an excellent work, on an ever increasingly pertinent topic. This long-awaited second edition provides a thorough and comprehensive update of an already important text. I very highly recommend it to professionals and academics alike ; both neophytes and veterans will find it valuable. It is a fundamental work that cannot be ignored in the field of subject analysis and retrieval for all bibliographic systems, including online catalogs."
  5. Milani, S.O.; Chaves Guimarães, J.A.; Olson, H.A.: Bias in subject representation : convergences and divergences in the international literature (2014) 0.01
    0.008899377 = product of:
      0.017798753 = sum of:
        0.017798753 = product of:
          0.035597507 = sum of:
            0.035597507 = weight(_text_:22 in 1443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035597507 = score(doc=1443,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15334454 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043789834 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1443, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1443)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik