Search (6 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Olson, H.A."
  1. Olson, H.A.: Dewey thinks therefore he is : the epistemic stance of Dewey and DDC (1996) 0.02
    0.015406125 = product of:
      0.03081225 = sum of:
        0.03081225 = product of:
          0.0616245 = sum of:
            0.0616245 = weight(_text_:language in 5186) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0616245 = score(doc=5186,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2030952 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051766515 = queryNorm
                0.30342668 = fieldWeight in 5186, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5186)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The acceptance of a traditional Cartesian epistemology confined Melvil Dewey and his classification to a narrow consideration of knowledge while assuming the necessity of a universal language to describe it. The result is that the DDC marginalizes groups and topics outside of canonical knowledge. A feminist critique of Dewey's introductions to DDC and examples from The Electronic Dewey illustrate this problem. By taking a poststructural perspective, variations becomes theoretically possible and necessary for ethical practice
  2. Olson, H.A.; Schlegl, R.: Standardization, objectivity, and user focus : a meta-analysis of subject access critiques (2001) 0.01
    0.01320525 = product of:
      0.0264105 = sum of:
        0.0264105 = product of:
          0.052821 = sum of:
            0.052821 = weight(_text_:language in 5428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.052821 = score(doc=5428,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2030952 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051766515 = queryNorm
                0.26008 = fieldWeight in 5428, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5428)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Critiques of subject access standards in LIS literature have addressed biases of gender, sexuality, race, age, ability, ethnicity, language and religion as limits to the representation of diversity and to effective library service for diverse populations. The current study identifies and analyzes this literature as a basis for ameliorating systemic bias and to gather the existing literature for wider accessibility. The study analyzes five quantitative variables: standards discussed, categories of problems, marginalized groups and topics discussed, date, and basis of conclusions (research or experience). Textual analysis reveals that basic tenets of subject access-user-focused cataloguing, objectivity, and standardization-are problematized in the literature and may be the best starting point for future research. In practice, librarians can work to counteract systemic problems in the careful and equitable application of standards and their adaptation to local contexts.
  3. Olson, H.A.: Sameness and difference : a cultural foundation of classification (2001) 0.01
    0.012273884 = product of:
      0.024547769 = sum of:
        0.024547769 = product of:
          0.049095538 = sum of:
            0.049095538 = weight(_text_:22 in 166) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049095538 = score(doc=166,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18127751 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051766515 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 166, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=166)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  4. Olson, H.A.: Social influences on classification (2010) 0.01
    0.011004375 = product of:
      0.02200875 = sum of:
        0.02200875 = product of:
          0.0440175 = sum of:
            0.0440175 = weight(_text_:language in 4702) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0440175 = score(doc=4702,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2030952 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051766515 = queryNorm
                0.21673335 = fieldWeight in 4702, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4702)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The social and cultural influences on classification are evident in both the content and structure of classifications. In content, warrant, the basis on which content is determined, is most significant. Warrant is related to the purpose of the classification and has varied historically from the classical Greeks to the present. Warrant, whether it be what is written or published on a topic, what is taught, natural phenomena, or other factors is susceptible to all of the biases of the society that produces a classification. Biases of race, gender, orientation, geography, culture, language, and other factors are well-documented in relation to bibliographic classification. Bias occurs not only as a result of the warrant that determines content, but also as a result of classificatory structure. Classificatory structure may be culturally specific and the hierarchy typical of western classificatory structure can convey social influence through hierarchical force, ghettoization, and diasporization. Jesse Shera suggests the social importance of librarians and their role in classification. Combining Shera's theoretical stance with the historical/philosophical record and the empirical evidence of numerous studies in bibliographic classification, the link between society and classification is robust and of significance to the field of library and information science.
  5. Milani, S.O.; Chaves Guimarães, J.A.; Olson, H.A.: Bias in subject representation : convergences and divergences in the international literature (2014) 0.01
    0.010520472 = product of:
      0.021040944 = sum of:
        0.021040944 = product of:
          0.04208189 = sum of:
            0.04208189 = weight(_text_:22 in 1443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04208189 = score(doc=1443,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18127751 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051766515 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1443, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1443)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  6. Olson, H.A.: How we construct subjects : a feminist analysis (2007) 0.01
    0.00876706 = product of:
      0.01753412 = sum of:
        0.01753412 = product of:
          0.03506824 = sum of:
            0.03506824 = weight(_text_:22 in 5588) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03506824 = score(doc=5588,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18127751 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051766515 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5588, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5588)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    11.12.2019 19:00:22