-
Baird, L.M.; Oppenheim, C.: Do citations matter? (1994)
0.02
0.01726951 = sum of:
0.013582956 = product of:
0.08149774 = sum of:
0.08149774 = weight(_text_:authors in 6896) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08149774 = score(doc=6896,freq=4.0), product of:
0.19068757 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.041828327 = queryNorm
0.42738882 = fieldWeight in 6896, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6896)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
0.0036865554 = product of:
0.007373111 = sum of:
0.007373111 = weight(_text_:a in 6896) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007373111 = score(doc=6896,freq=8.0), product of:
0.048230026 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.041828327 = queryNorm
0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 6896, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6896)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Citation indexes are based on the principle of authors citing previous articles of relevance. The paper demonstrates the long history of citing for precedent and notes how ISI's citation indexes differ from 'Shephards Citations'. The paper analyses some of the criticisms of citations counting, and some of the uses for which citation analysis has been employed. The paper also examines the idea of the development of an Acknowledgement Index, and concludes such an index is unlikely to be commercially viable. The paper describes a citation study of Eugene Garfield, and concludes that he may be the most heavily cited information scientist, that he is a heavy self-citer, and that the reasons why other authors cite Garfield are different from the reasons why he cites himself. The paper concludes that citation studies remain a valid methgod of analysis of individuals', institutions', or journals' impact, but need to be used with caution and in conjunction with other measures
- Type
- a
-
Johnson, B.; Oppenheim, C.: How socially connected are citers to those that they cite? (2007)
0.01
0.012067879 = sum of:
0.008003834 = product of:
0.048023 = sum of:
0.048023 = weight(_text_:authors in 839) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048023 = score(doc=839,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19068757 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.041828327 = queryNorm
0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 839, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=839)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
0.0040640454 = product of:
0.008128091 = sum of:
0.008128091 = weight(_text_:a in 839) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008128091 = score(doc=839,freq=14.0), product of:
0.048230026 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.041828327 = queryNorm
0.1685276 = fieldWeight in 839, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=839)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to report an investigation into the social and citation networks of three information scientists: David Nicholas, Peter Williams and Paul Huntington. Design/methodology/approach - Similarities between citation patterns and social closeness were identified and discussed. A total of 16 individuals in the citation network were identified and investigated using citation analysis, and a matrix formed of citations made between those in the network. Social connections between the 16 in the citation network were then investigated by means of a questionnaire, the results of which were merged into a separate matrix. These matrices were converted into visual social networks, using multidimensional scaling. A new deviance measure was devised for drawing comparisons between social and citation closeness in individual cases. Findings - Nicholas, Williams and Huntington were found to have cited 527 authors in the period 2000-2003, the 16 most cited becoming the subjects of further citation and social investigation. This comparison, along with the examination of visual representations indicates a positive correlation between social closeness and citation counts. Possible explanations for this correlation are discussed, and implications considered. Despite this correlation, the information scientists were found to cite widely outside their immediate social connections. Originality/value - Social network analysis has not been often used in combination with citation analysis to explore inter-relationships in research teams.
- Type
- a
-
Oppenheim, C.: Do citations count? : Citation indexing and the Research Assessment Exercise (RAE) (1996)
0.00
0.0017378589 = product of:
0.0034757177 = sum of:
0.0034757177 = product of:
0.0069514355 = sum of:
0.0069514355 = weight(_text_:a in 6673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0069514355 = score(doc=6673,freq=4.0), product of:
0.048230026 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.041828327 = queryNorm
0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 6673, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6673)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Citations are used to illustrate or elaborate on a point, or to criticize. Citation studies, based on ISI's citation indexes, can help evaluate scientific research, while impact factors aid libraries in deciding which journals to cancel or purchase. Suggests that citiation counts can replace the costly RAE in assessing the research output of university departments
- Type
- a