Tomaiuolo, N.G.; Packer, J.G.: Quantitative analysis of five WWW 'search engines' (1996)
0.02
0.02397859 = sum of:
0.019619105 = product of:
0.15695284 = sum of:
0.15695284 = weight(_text_:asked in 5675) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15695284 = score(doc=5675,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23293972 = queryWeight, product of:
6.0984654 = idf(docFreq=269, maxDocs=44218)
0.03819645 = queryNorm
0.67379165 = fieldWeight in 5675, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.0984654 = idf(docFreq=269, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5675)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
0.004359484 = product of:
0.008718968 = sum of:
0.008718968 = weight(_text_:e in 5675) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008718968 = score(doc=5675,freq=2.0), product of:
0.054902427 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.03819645 = queryNorm
0.15880844 = fieldWeight in 5675, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5675)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Provides a table of the results from over 100 questions actually asked at a library reference desk: The summary notes the average number of relevant 'hits' for all investigated search engines are: AltaVista: 9.3; InfoSeek: 8.3; Lycos: 8.1; Magellan: 7.8; Point: 2.1
- Language
- e
