Search (8 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Paice, C.D."
  1. Paice, C.D.: Soft evaluation of Boolean search queries in information retrieval systems (1984) 0.01
    0.010065834 = product of:
      0.025164586 = sum of:
        0.009535614 = weight(_text_:a in 789) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009535614 = score(doc=789,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 789, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=789)
        0.015628971 = product of:
          0.031257942 = sum of:
            0.031257942 = weight(_text_:information in 789) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031257942 = score(doc=789,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.3840108 = fieldWeight in 789, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=789)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Source
    Information technology: research and development. 3(1984) no.1, S.xx-xx
    Type
    a
  2. Paice, C.D.: Automatic abstracting (1994) 0.01
    0.009411185 = product of:
      0.023527961 = sum of:
        0.010897844 = weight(_text_:a in 1255) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010897844 = score(doc=1255,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 1255, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1255)
        0.012630116 = product of:
          0.025260232 = sum of:
            0.025260232 = weight(_text_:information in 1255) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025260232 = score(doc=1255,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 1255, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1255)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Source
    Encyclopedia of library and information science. Vol.53, [=Suppl.16]
    Type
    a
  3. Paice, C.D.: ¬A thesaural model of information retrieval (1991) 0.01
    0.008874074 = product of:
      0.022185184 = sum of:
        0.012614433 = weight(_text_:a in 2294) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012614433 = score(doc=2294,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.23593865 = fieldWeight in 2294, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2294)
        0.009570752 = product of:
          0.019141505 = sum of:
            0.019141505 = weight(_text_:information in 2294) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.019141505 = score(doc=2294,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.23515764 = fieldWeight in 2294, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2294)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    In an information retrieval system both queries and document representatives can be viewed as representations of topics. The central activity of such a system is thus the comparison of one topic representation with another. The set of terms contained in a typical topic representation may be adjusted or extended by reference to a domain thesaurus. This paper proposes that topic representations should actually consist of excerpts from a domain thesaurus, generated by a spreading activation technique. An algorithm for generating excerpts is outlines and exemplified, and the problem of assessing the resemblance between two excerpts is discussed. The paper questions whether existing thesauri would be adequate for this purpose, and offers some ideas on how suitable thesauri might be constructed
    Source
    Information processing and management. 27(1991) no.5, S.433-447
    Type
    a
  4. Twidale, M.B.; Nichols, D.M.; Paice, C.D.: Browsing a collaborative process (1997) 0.01
    0.007931474 = product of:
      0.019828685 = sum of:
        0.010897844 = weight(_text_:a in 2261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010897844 = score(doc=2261,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 2261, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2261)
        0.0089308405 = product of:
          0.017861681 = sum of:
            0.017861681 = weight(_text_:information in 2261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.017861681 = score(doc=2261,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 2261, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2261)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Collaboration is an important aspect of searching online information retrieval systems that requires explicit computerized support. Surveys a number of systems offering varied approaches to supporting collaboration and applies a strucutre for analysing the various aspect of collaboration. The dominant form of collaboration in digital libraries is likely to be remote and asynchronous. Collaborative work in the digital library requires that both the search product and the search process can be captured and communicated. Introduces the ARIADNE system as an example of computerized support for collaboration between bowsers
    Source
    Information processing and management. 33(1997) no.6, S.761-783
    Type
    a
  5. Paice, C.D.: Expert systems for information retrieval? (1986) 0.01
    0.00711762 = product of:
      0.01779405 = sum of:
        0.0067426977 = weight(_text_:a in 1101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0067426977 = score(doc=1101,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.12611452 = fieldWeight in 1101, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1101)
        0.011051352 = product of:
          0.022102704 = sum of:
            0.022102704 = weight(_text_:information in 1101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022102704 = score(doc=1101,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 1101, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1101)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    This paper examines the relevance of the expert systems approach to information retrieval. First, the purpose and nature of expert systems are outlined, and it is argued that only in domains with relatively limited and clear-cut rule-sets will such systems be viable in the near future. The expert systems approach is then related to the provision of interfaces for OPACs and IR systems. Intermediary systems, designed to clarify through dialogue the terms of a client's information need, are described, and the prospects for such systems are discussed. It is argued that relatively straightforward rule-sets should suffice, and that useful systems may therefore be available fairly soon. Since they could facilitate access to general as well as to specialised information, the potential demand for such systems would seem to be enormous
    Type
    a
  6. Johnson, F.C.; Paice, C.D.; Black, W.J.; Neal, A.P.: ¬The application of linguistic processing to automatic abstract generation (1993) 0.01
    0.00588199 = product of:
      0.014704974 = sum of:
        0.0068111527 = weight(_text_:a in 2290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0068111527 = score(doc=2290,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 2290, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2290)
        0.007893822 = product of:
          0.015787644 = sum of:
            0.015787644 = weight(_text_:information in 2290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.015787644 = score(doc=2290,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 2290, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2290)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Footnote
    Wiederabgedruckt in: Readings in information retrieval. Ed.: K. Sparck Jones u. P. Willett. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann 1997. S.538-552.
    Type
    a
  7. Paice, C.D.: Method for evaluation of stemming algorithms based on error counting (1996) 0.00
    0.0047055925 = product of:
      0.011763981 = sum of:
        0.005448922 = weight(_text_:a in 5799) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005448922 = score(doc=5799,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 5799, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5799)
        0.006315058 = product of:
          0.012630116 = sum of:
            0.012630116 = weight(_text_:information in 5799) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.012630116 = score(doc=5799,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 5799, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5799)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 47(1996) no.8, S.632-649
    Type
    a
  8. Paice, C.D.: Automatic abstracting (1994) 0.00
    0.0013622305 = product of:
      0.0068111527 = sum of:
        0.0068111527 = weight(_text_:a in 917) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0068111527 = score(doc=917,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 917, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=917)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    The final report of the 2nd British Library abstracting project (the BLAB project), 1990-1992, which was carried out partly at the Computing Department of Lancaster University, and partly at the Centre for Computational Linguistics, UMIST. This project built on the results of the first project, of 1985-1987, to build a system designed create abstracts automatically from given texts