Panigrahi, P.: Ranganathan and Dewey in hierarchical subject classification : some similarities (2015)
0.01
0.005362654 = product of:
0.021450616 = sum of:
0.012622404 = weight(_text_:of in 2789) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012622404 = score(doc=2789,freq=4.0), product of:
0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.19546966 = fieldWeight in 2789, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2789)
0.008828212 = product of:
0.017656423 = sum of:
0.017656423 = weight(_text_:on in 2789) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017656423 = score(doc=2789,freq=2.0), product of:
0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.19440265 = fieldWeight in 2789, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2789)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Abstract
- S R Ranganathan and Melvil Dewey devised two types of classification schemes viz., faceted and enumerative. Ranganathan's faceted classification scheme is based on postulates, principles and canons. It has a strong theory. While working with the two schemes, similarities are observed. This paper tries to identify and present some relationships.
- Source
- Annals of library and information studies. 62(2015) no.4, S.265-267
