Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Parameswaran, M."
  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  1. Kumar, T.V.R.; Parameswaran, M.: Chain indexing and LISA (1998) 0.04
    0.03861385 = sum of:
      0.024195446 = product of:
        0.09678178 = sum of:
          0.09678178 = weight(_text_:authors in 2029) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09678178 = score(doc=2029,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.24018547 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052685954 = queryNorm
              0.40294603 = fieldWeight in 2029, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2029)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.014418405 = product of:
        0.02883681 = sum of:
          0.02883681 = weight(_text_:m in 2029) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.02883681 = score(doc=2029,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13110629 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052685954 = queryNorm
              0.21994986 = fieldWeight in 2029, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2029)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Ranaganathan's chain indexing technique is devised as a complementary and supplementary tool to classification schemes. However, due to the efficiency and economy, this technique can effectively be made use of in deriving alphabetical subject indexes for any indexing/abstracting services. The authors have made a close analysis of LISA to elucidate the extent of the impact of chain indexing in it. Some of the problems found in the application of chain procedure in alphabetical subject indexing are identified and the solution found in LISA has been explained
  2. Kumar, T.V.R.; Parameswaran, M.: Chain indexing and UDC (1999) 0.01
    0.012616104 = product of:
      0.025232209 = sum of:
        0.025232209 = product of:
          0.050464418 = sum of:
            0.050464418 = weight(_text_:m in 3796) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.050464418 = score(doc=3796,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13110629 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052685954 = queryNorm
                0.38491225 = fieldWeight in 3796, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3796)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  3. Kumar, T.V.R.; Parameswaran, M.: Chain procedure and dictionary catalogue (1998) 0.01
    0.010813803 = product of:
      0.021627607 = sum of:
        0.021627607 = product of:
          0.043255214 = sum of:
            0.043255214 = weight(_text_:m in 6205) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043255214 = score(doc=6205,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13110629 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052685954 = queryNorm
                0.3299248 = fieldWeight in 6205, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6205)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  4. Parameswaran, M.: Chain procedure and Dewey Decimal Classification (1990) 0.01
    0.0072092023 = product of:
      0.014418405 = sum of:
        0.014418405 = product of:
          0.02883681 = sum of:
            0.02883681 = weight(_text_:m in 4787) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02883681 = score(doc=4787,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13110629 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052685954 = queryNorm
                0.21994986 = fieldWeight in 4787, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4787)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)