Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

Did you mean:
lcsh's%3a%20libraries %2f information technology%22 5
lcshs%3a%20libraries %2f information technology%22 5

Park, T.K.: ¬The nature of relevance in information retrieval : an empirical study (1992) 0.01

0.008101207 = product of:
  0.03240483 = sum of:
    0.03240483 = weight(_text_:information in 5370) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03240483 = score(doc=5370,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047586527 = queryNorm
        0.38790947 = fieldWeight in 5370, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=5370)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Park, T.K.: Survey of electronic journals in OCLC : the extent and quality of cataloging (1996) 0.01

0.0056126816 = product of:
  0.022450726 = sum of:
    0.022450726 = weight(_text_:information in 7375) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022450726 = score(doc=7375,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047586527 = queryNorm
        0.2687516 = fieldWeight in 7375, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7375)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Imprint: Medford, NJ : Learned Information
Source: Global complexity: information, chaos and control. Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, ASIS'96, Baltimore, Maryland, 21-24 Oct 1996. Ed.: S. Hardin

Park, T.K.: Toward a theory of user-based relevance : a call for a new paradigm of inquiry (1994) 0.00
```
0.0049110963 = product of:
  0.019644385 = sum of:
    0.019644385 = weight(_text_:information in 6926) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019644385 = score(doc=6926,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047586527 = queryNorm
        0.23515764 = fieldWeight in 6926, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6926)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
```
Abstract

The concept of relevance has played a major role in the evaluation of information retrieval and its research without much consideration of users. While methodological deficiencies have been noted and criticized, the study of relevance is still suffering from much discussion of alternative methods. This article discusses the need to develop the concept of user-based relevance for the benefit of users and for the meaningful development of future research in information retrieval. Some of the characteristics of users' criteria of relevance are examined from the literature. The use of a qualitative research approach is suggested as an alternative methodology for studying user-based relevance along with a discussion of the essential characteristics and the core philosophical assumptions underlying the inquiry paradigm

Source

Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 45(1994) no.3, S.135-141
Park, T.K.: ¬The nature of relevance in information retrieval : an empirical study (1993) 0.00
```
0.004209511 = product of:
  0.016838044 = sum of:
    0.016838044 = weight(_text_:information in 5336) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016838044 = score(doc=5336,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047586527 = queryNorm
        0.20156369 = fieldWeight in 5336, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5336)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
```
Abstract

Experimental research in information retrieval (IR) depends on the idea of relevance. Because of its key role in IR, recent questions about relevance have raised issues of methododlogical concern and have shaken the philosophical foundations of IR theory development. Despite an existing set of theoretical definitions of this concept, our understanding of relevance from users' perspectives is still limited. Using naturalistic inquiry methodology, this article reports an emprical study of user-based relevance interpretations. A model is presented that reflects the nature of the thought process of users who are evaluating bibliographic citations produced by a document retrieval system. Three major categories of variables affecting relevance assessments - internal context, external context, and problem context - are idetified and described. Users' relevance assessments involve multiple layers of interpretations that are derived from individuals' experiences, perceptions, and private knowledge related to the particular information problems at hand

Harter, S.P.; Park, T.K.: Impact of prior electronic publication on manuscript consideration policies of scholarly journals (2000) 0.00

0.0016202416 = product of:
  0.006480966 = sum of:
    0.006480966 = weight(_text_:information in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.006480966 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047586527 = queryNorm
        0.0775819 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source: Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 51(2000) no.10, S.940-948

Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

Years

Types

Themes