Search (8 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Petras, V."
  1. Petras, V.: Heterogenitätsbehandlung und Terminology Mapping durch Crosskonkordanzen : eine Fallstudie (2010) 0.03 
    0.0324542 = product of:
  0.0649084 = sum of:
    0.0649084 = sum of:
      0.01476077 = weight(_text_:d in 3730) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.01476077 = score(doc=3730,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.10045733 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052875843 = queryNorm
          0.14693572 = fieldWeight in 3730, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3730)
      0.050147627 = weight(_text_:22 in 3730) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.050147627 = score(doc=3730,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18516219 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052875843 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3730, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3730)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Language
    d
    Source
    Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
  2. Mayr, P.; Petras, V.: Building a Terminology Network for Search : the KoMoHe project (2008) 0.01 
    0.012536907 = product of:
  0.025073813 = sum of:
    0.025073813 = product of:
      0.050147627 = sum of:
        0.050147627 = weight(_text_:22 in 2618) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.050147627 = score(doc=2618,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18516219 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052875843 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2618, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2618)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  3. Mayr, P.; Mutschke, P.; Petras, V.: Reducing semantic complexity in distributed digital libraries : Treatment of term vagueness and document re-ranking (2008) 0.01 
    0.0075883283 = product of:
  0.015176657 = sum of:
    0.015176657 = product of:
      0.060706627 = sum of:
        0.060706627 = weight(_text_:authors in 1909) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.060706627 = score(doc=1909,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24105114 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052875843 = queryNorm
            0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 1909, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1909)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Purpose - The general science portal "vascoda" merges structured, high-quality information collections from more than 40 providers on the basis of search engine technology (FAST) and a concept which treats semantic heterogeneity between different controlled vocabularies. First experiences with the portal show some weaknesses of this approach which come out in most metadata-driven Digital Libraries (DLs) or subject specific portals. The purpose of the paper is to propose models to reduce the semantic complexity in heterogeneous DLs. The aim is to introduce value-added services (treatment of term vagueness and document re-ranking) that gain a certain quality in DLs if they are combined with heterogeneity components established in the project "Competence Center Modeling and Treatment of Semantic Heterogeneity". Design/methodology/approach - Two methods, which are derived from scientometrics and network analysis, will be implemented with the objective to re-rank result sets by the following structural properties: the ranking of the results by core journals (so-called Bradfordizing) and ranking by centrality of authors in co-authorship networks. Findings - The methods, which will be implemented, focus on the query and on the result side of a search and are designed to positively influence each other. Conceptually, they will improve the search quality and guarantee that the most relevant documents in result sets will be ranked higher. Originality/value - The central impact of the paper focuses on the integration of three structural value-adding methods, which aim at reducing the semantic complexity represented in distributed DLs at several stages in the information retrieval process: query construction, search and ranking and re-ranking.
  4. Petras, V.; Womser-Hacker, C.: Evaluation im Information Retrieval (2023) 0.01 
    0.0054785158 = product of:
  0.0109570315 = sum of:
    0.0109570315 = product of:
      0.021914063 = sum of:
        0.021914063 = weight(_text_:d in 808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021914063 = score(doc=808,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.10045733 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052875843 = queryNorm
            0.21814299 = fieldWeight in 808, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=808)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Das Ziel einer Evaluation ist die Überprüfung, ob bzw. in welchem Ausmaß ein Informationssystem die an das System gestellten Anforderungen erfüllt. Informationssysteme können aus verschiedenen Perspektiven evaluiert werden. Für eine ganzheitliche Evaluation (als Synonym wird auch Evaluierung benutzt), die unterschiedliche Qualitätsaspekte betrachtet (z. B. wie gut ein System relevante Dokumente rankt, wie schnell ein System die Suche durchführt, wie die Ergebnispräsentation gestaltet ist oder wie Suchende durch das System geführt werden) und die Erfüllung mehrerer Anforderungen überprüft, empfiehlt es sich, sowohl eine perspektivische als auch methodische Triangulation (d. h. der Einsatz von mehreren Ansätzen zur Qualitätsüberprüfung) vorzunehmen. Im Information Retrieval (IR) konzentriert sich die Evaluation auf die Qualitätseinschätzung der Suchfunktion eines Information-Retrieval-Systems (IRS), wobei oft zwischen systemzentrierter und nutzerzentrierter Evaluation unterschieden wird. Dieses Kapitel setzt den Fokus auf die systemzentrierte Evaluation, während andere Kapitel dieses Handbuchs andere Evaluationsansätze diskutieren (s. Kapitel C 4 Interaktives Information Retrieval, C 7 Cross-Language Information Retrieval und D 1 Information Behavior).
    Language
    d
  5. Petras, V.; Bank, M.: Vergleich der Suchmaschinen AltaVista und HotBot bezüglich Treffermengen und Aktualität (1998) 0.00 
    0.004217363 = product of:
  0.008434726 = sum of:
    0.008434726 = product of:
      0.016869452 = sum of:
        0.016869452 = weight(_text_:d in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016869452 = score(doc=2514,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10045733 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052875843 = queryNorm
            0.16792654 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Language
    d
  6. Mayr, P.; Petras, V.: Crosskonkordanzen : Terminologie Mapping und deren Effektivität für das Information Retrieval 0.00 
    0.0036901925 = product of:
  0.007380385 = sum of:
    0.007380385 = product of:
      0.01476077 = sum of:
        0.01476077 = weight(_text_:d in 1996) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01476077 = score(doc=1996,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10045733 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052875843 = queryNorm
            0.14693572 = fieldWeight in 1996, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1996)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Language
    d
  7. Huckstorf, A.; Petras, V.: Mind the lexical gap : EuroVoc Building Block of the Semantic Web (2011) 0.00 
    0.0031630222 = product of:
  0.0063260444 = sum of:
    0.0063260444 = product of:
      0.012652089 = sum of:
        0.012652089 = weight(_text_:d in 2782) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012652089 = score(doc=2782,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10045733 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052875843 = queryNorm
            0.1259449 = fieldWeight in 2782, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2782)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Language
    d
  8. Menzel, S.; Schnaitter, H.; Zinck, J.; Petras, V.; Neudecker, C.; Labusch, K.; Leitner, E.; Rehm, G.: Named Entity Linking mit Wikidata und GND : das Potenzial handkuratierter und strukturierter Datenquellen für die semantische Anreicherung von Volltexten (2021) 0.00 
    0.002635852 = product of:
  0.005271704 = sum of:
    0.005271704 = product of:
      0.010543408 = sum of:
        0.010543408 = weight(_text_:d in 373) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010543408 = score(doc=373,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10045733 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052875843 = queryNorm
            0.104954086 = fieldWeight in 373, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=373)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Language
    d

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

Themes