-
Petras, V.: Heterogenitätsbehandlung und Terminology Mapping durch Crosskonkordanzen : eine Fallstudie (2010)
0.08
0.08286166 = product of:
0.13810277 = sum of:
0.004767807 = weight(_text_:a in 3730) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.004767807 = score(doc=3730,freq=2.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.089176424 = fieldWeight in 3730, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3730)
0.11134702 = weight(_text_:91 in 3730) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11134702 = score(doc=3730,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25837386 = queryWeight, product of:
5.5722036 = idf(docFreq=456, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.43095312 = fieldWeight in 3730, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.5722036 = idf(docFreq=456, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3730)
0.021987949 = product of:
0.043975897 = sum of:
0.043975897 = weight(_text_:22 in 3730) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043975897 = score(doc=3730,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16237405 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3730, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3730)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Pages
- S.91-102
- Source
- Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
- Type
- a
-
Mayr, P.; Petras, V.: Building a Terminology Network for Search : the KoMoHe project (2008)
0.01
0.012609425 = product of:
0.031523563 = sum of:
0.009535614 = weight(_text_:a in 2618) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009535614 = score(doc=2618,freq=8.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 2618, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2618)
0.021987949 = product of:
0.043975897 = sum of:
0.043975897 = weight(_text_:22 in 2618) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043975897 = score(doc=2618,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16237405 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2618, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2618)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- The paper reports about results on the GESIS-IZ project "Competence Center Modeling and Treatment of Semantic Heterogeneity" (KoMoHe). KoMoHe supervised a terminology mapping effort, in which 'cross-concordances' between major controlled vocabularies were organized, created and managed. In this paper we describe the establishment and implementation of crossconcordances for search in a digital library (DL).
- Source
- Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
- Type
- a
-
Petras, V.: ¬The identity of information science (2023)
0.01
0.008631657 = product of:
0.021579143 = sum of:
0.0068111527 = weight(_text_:a in 1077) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0068111527 = score(doc=1077,freq=8.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 1077, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1077)
0.01476799 = product of:
0.02953598 = sum of:
0.02953598 = weight(_text_:information in 1077) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02953598 = score(doc=1077,freq=28.0), product of:
0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.3628561 = fieldWeight in 1077, product of:
5.2915025 = tf(freq=28.0), with freq of:
28.0 = termFreq=28.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1077)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Purpose This paper offers a definition of the core of information science, which encompasses most research in the field. The definition provides a unique identity for information science and positions it in the disciplinary universe. Design/methodology/approach After motivating the objective, a definition of the core and an explanation of its key aspects are provided. The definition is related to other definitions of information science before controversial discourse aspects are briefly addressed: discipline vs. field, science vs. humanities, library vs. information science and application vs. theory. Interdisciplinarity as an often-assumed foundation of information science is challenged. Findings Information science is concerned with how information is manifested across space and time. Information is manifested to facilitate and support the representation, access, documentation and preservation of ideas, activities, or practices, and to enable different types of interactions. Research and professional practice encompass the infrastructures - institutions and technology -and phenomena and practices around manifested information across space and time as its core contribution to the scholarly landscape. Information science collaborates with other disciplines to work on complex information problems that need multi- and interdisciplinary approaches to address them. Originality/value The paper argues that new information problems may change the core of the field, but throughout its existence, the discipline has remained quite stable in its central focus, yet proved to be highly adaptive to the tremendous changes in the forms, practices, institutions and technologies around and for manifested information.
- Type
- a
-
Mayr, P.; Mutschke, P.; Petras, V.; Schaer, P.; Sure, Y.: Applying science models for search (2010)
0.01
0.0063011474 = product of:
0.015752869 = sum of:
0.009437811 = weight(_text_:a in 4663) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009437811 = score(doc=4663,freq=6.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 4663, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4663)
0.006315058 = product of:
0.012630116 = sum of:
0.012630116 = weight(_text_:information in 4663) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012630116 = score(doc=4663,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 4663, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4663)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- The paper proposes three different kinds of science models as value-added services that are integrated in the retrieval process to enhance retrieval quailty. The paper discusses the approaches Search Term Recommendation, Bradfordizing and Author Centrality on a general level and addresses implementation issues of the models within a real-life retrieval environment.
- Source
- Information und Wissen: global, sozial und frei? Proceedings des 12. Internationalen Symposiums für Informationswissenschaft (ISI 2011) ; Hildesheim, 9. - 11. März 2011. Hrsg.: J. Griesbaum, T. Mandl u. C. Womser-Hacker
- Type
- a
-
Petras, V.; Womser-Hacker, C.: Evaluation im Information Retrieval (2023)
0.01
0.0062752785 = product of:
0.015688196 = sum of:
0.004086692 = weight(_text_:a in 808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.004086692 = score(doc=808,freq=2.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.07643694 = fieldWeight in 808, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=808)
0.011601503 = product of:
0.023203006 = sum of:
0.023203006 = weight(_text_:information in 808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023203006 = score(doc=808,freq=12.0), product of:
0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.2850541 = fieldWeight in 808, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=808)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Das Ziel einer Evaluation ist die Überprüfung, ob bzw. in welchem Ausmaß ein Informationssystem die an das System gestellten Anforderungen erfüllt. Informationssysteme können aus verschiedenen Perspektiven evaluiert werden. Für eine ganzheitliche Evaluation (als Synonym wird auch Evaluierung benutzt), die unterschiedliche Qualitätsaspekte betrachtet (z. B. wie gut ein System relevante Dokumente rankt, wie schnell ein System die Suche durchführt, wie die Ergebnispräsentation gestaltet ist oder wie Suchende durch das System geführt werden) und die Erfüllung mehrerer Anforderungen überprüft, empfiehlt es sich, sowohl eine perspektivische als auch methodische Triangulation (d. h. der Einsatz von mehreren Ansätzen zur Qualitätsüberprüfung) vorzunehmen. Im Information Retrieval (IR) konzentriert sich die Evaluation auf die Qualitätseinschätzung der Suchfunktion eines Information-Retrieval-Systems (IRS), wobei oft zwischen systemzentrierter und nutzerzentrierter Evaluation unterschieden wird. Dieses Kapitel setzt den Fokus auf die systemzentrierte Evaluation, während andere Kapitel dieses Handbuchs andere Evaluationsansätze diskutieren (s. Kapitel C 4 Interaktives Information Retrieval, C 7 Cross-Language Information Retrieval und D 1 Information Behavior).
- Type
- a
-
Mayr, P.; Petras, V.; Walter, A.-K.: Results from a German terminology mapping effort : intra- and interdisciplinary cross-concordances between controlled vocabularies (2007)
0.01
0.0061419047 = product of:
0.015354762 = sum of:
0.009829085 = weight(_text_:a in 542) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009829085 = score(doc=542,freq=34.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.1838419 = fieldWeight in 542, product of:
5.8309517 = tf(freq=34.0), with freq of:
34.0 = termFreq=34.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=542)
0.005525676 = product of:
0.011051352 = sum of:
0.011051352 = weight(_text_:information in 542) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011051352 = score(doc=542,freq=8.0), product of:
0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 542, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=542)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- In 2004, the German Federal Ministry for Education and Research funded a major terminology mapping initiative at the GESIS Social Science Information Centre in Bonn (GESIS-IZ), which will find its conclusion this year. The task of this terminology mapping initiative was to organize, create and manage 'crossconcordances' between major controlled vocabularies (thesauri, classification systems, subject heading lists) centred around the social sciences but quickly extending to other subject areas. Cross-concordances are intellectually (manually) created crosswalks that determine equivalence, hierarchy, and association relations between terms from two controlled vocabularies. Most vocabularies have been related bilaterally, that is, there is a cross-concordance relating terms from vocabulary A to vocabulary B as well as a cross-concordance relating terms from vocabulary B to vocabulary A (bilateral relations are not necessarily symmetrical). Till August 2007, 24 controlled vocabularies from 11 disciplines will be connected with vocabulary sizes ranging from 2,000 - 17,000 terms per vocabulary. To date more than 260,000 relations are generated. A database including all vocabularies and cross-concordances was built and a 'heterogeneity service' developed, a web service, which makes the cross-concordances available for other applications. Many cross-concordances are already implemented and utilized for the German Social Science Information Portal Sowiport (www.sowiport.de), which searches bibliographical and other information resources (incl. 13 databases with 10 different vocabularies and ca. 2.5 million references).
In the final phase of the project, a major evaluation effort is under way to test and measure the effectiveness of the vocabulary mappings in an information system environment. Actual user queries are tested in a distributed search environment, where several bibliographic databases with different controlled vocabularies are searched at the same time. Three query variations are compared to each other: a free-text search without focusing on using the controlled vocabulary or terminology mapping; a controlled vocabulary search, where terms from one vocabulary (a 'home' vocabulary thought to be familiar to the user of a particular database) are used to search all databases; and finally, a search, where controlled vocabulary terms are translated into the terms of the respective controlled vocabulary of the database. For evaluation purposes, types of cross-concordances are distinguished between intradisciplinary vocabularies (vocabularies within the social sciences) and interdisciplinary vocabularies (social sciences to other disciplines as well as other combinations). Simultaneously, an extensive quantitative analysis is conducted aimed at finding patterns in terminology mappings that can explain trends in the effectiveness of terminology mappings, particularly looking at overlapping terms, types of determined relations (equivalence, hierarchy etc.), size of participating vocabularies, etc. This project is the largest terminology mapping effort in Germany. The number and variety of controlled vocabularies targeted provide an optimal basis for insights and further research opportunities. To our knowledge, terminology mapping efforts have rarely been evaluated with stringent qualitative and quantitative measures. This research should contribute in this area. For the NKOS workshop, we plan to present an overview of the project and participating vocabularies, an introduction to the heterogeneity service and its application as well as some of the results and findings of the evaluation, which will be concluded in August.
-
Stiller, J.; Olensky, M.; Petras, V.: ¬A framework for the evaluation of automatic metadata enrichments (2014)
0.01
0.0060245167 = product of:
0.015061291 = sum of:
0.009535614 = weight(_text_:a in 1587) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009535614 = score(doc=1587,freq=8.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 1587, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1587)
0.005525676 = product of:
0.011051352 = sum of:
0.011051352 = weight(_text_:information in 1587) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011051352 = score(doc=1587,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 1587, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1587)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Automatic enrichment of collections connects data to vocabularies, which supports the contextualization of content and adds searchable text to metadata. The paper introduces a framework of four dimensions (frequency, coverage, relevance and error rate) that measure both the suitability of the enrichment for the object and the enrichments' contribution to search success. To verify the framework, it is applied to the evaluation of automatic enrichments in the digital library Europeana. The analysis of 100 result sets and their corresponding queries (1,121 documents total) shows the framework is a valuable tool for guiding enrichments and determining the value of enrichment efforts.
- Series
- Communications in computer and information science; 478
- Type
- a
-
Mayr, P.; Petras, V.: Cross-concordances : terminology mapping and its effectiveness for information retrieval (2008)
0.01
0.005593183 = product of:
0.013982957 = sum of:
0.005779455 = weight(_text_:a in 2323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005779455 = score(doc=2323,freq=4.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.10809815 = fieldWeight in 2323, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2323)
0.008203502 = product of:
0.016407004 = sum of:
0.016407004 = weight(_text_:information in 2323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016407004 = score(doc=2323,freq=6.0), product of:
0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.20156369 = fieldWeight in 2323, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2323)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- The German Federal Ministry for Education and Research funded a major terminology mapping initiative, which found its conclusion in 2007. The task of this terminology mapping initiative was to organize, create and manage 'cross-concordances' between controlled vocabularies (thesauri, classification systems, subject heading lists) centred around the social sciences but quickly extending to other subject areas. 64 crosswalks with more than 500,000 relations were established. In the final phase of the project, a major evaluation effort to test and measure the effectiveness of the vocabulary mappings in an information system environment was conducted. The paper reports on the cross-concordance work and evaluation results.
- Content
- Beitrag während: World library and information congress: 74th IFLA general conference and council, 10-14 August 2008, Québec, Canada.
-
Mayr, P.; Mutschke, P.; Petras, V.: Reducing semantic complexity in distributed digital libraries : Treatment of term vagueness and document re-ranking (2008)
0.01
0.0054589617 = product of:
0.0136474045 = sum of:
0.0068111527 = weight(_text_:a in 1909) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0068111527 = score(doc=1909,freq=8.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 1909, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1909)
0.006836252 = product of:
0.013672504 = sum of:
0.013672504 = weight(_text_:information in 1909) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013672504 = score(doc=1909,freq=6.0), product of:
0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.16796975 = fieldWeight in 1909, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1909)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Purpose - The general science portal "vascoda" merges structured, high-quality information collections from more than 40 providers on the basis of search engine technology (FAST) and a concept which treats semantic heterogeneity between different controlled vocabularies. First experiences with the portal show some weaknesses of this approach which come out in most metadata-driven Digital Libraries (DLs) or subject specific portals. The purpose of the paper is to propose models to reduce the semantic complexity in heterogeneous DLs. The aim is to introduce value-added services (treatment of term vagueness and document re-ranking) that gain a certain quality in DLs if they are combined with heterogeneity components established in the project "Competence Center Modeling and Treatment of Semantic Heterogeneity". Design/methodology/approach - Two methods, which are derived from scientometrics and network analysis, will be implemented with the objective to re-rank result sets by the following structural properties: the ranking of the results by core journals (so-called Bradfordizing) and ranking by centrality of authors in co-authorship networks. Findings - The methods, which will be implemented, focus on the query and on the result side of a search and are designed to positively influence each other. Conceptually, they will improve the search quality and guarantee that the most relevant documents in result sets will be ranked higher. Originality/value - The central impact of the paper focuses on the integration of three structural value-adding methods, which aim at reducing the semantic complexity represented in distributed DLs at several stages in the information retrieval process: query construction, search and ranking and re-ranking.
- Theme
- Information Gateway
- Type
- a
-
Huckstorf, A.; Petras, V.: Mind the lexical gap : EuroVoc Building Block of the Semantic Web (2011)
0.00
0.0049910345 = product of:
0.012477586 = sum of:
0.005779455 = weight(_text_:a in 2782) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005779455 = score(doc=2782,freq=4.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.10809815 = fieldWeight in 2782, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2782)
0.0066981306 = product of:
0.013396261 = sum of:
0.013396261 = weight(_text_:information in 2782) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013396261 = score(doc=2782,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 2782, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2782)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Ein Konferenzereignis der besonderen Art fand am 18. und 19. November 2010 in Luxemburg statt. Initiiert durch das Amt für Veröffentlichungen der Europäischen Union (http://publications.europa.eu) waren Bibliothekare und Information Professionals eingeladen, um über die Zukunft mehrsprachiger kontrollierter Vokabulare in Informationssystemen und insbesondere deren Beitrag zum Semantic Web zu diskutieren. Organisiert wurde die Konferenz durch das EuroVoc-Team, das den Thesaurus der Europäischen Union bearbeitet. Die letzte EuroVoc-Konferenz fand im Jahr 2006 statt. In der Zwischenzeit ist EuroVoc zu einem ontologie-basierten Thesaurusmanagementsystem übergegangen und hat systematisch begonnen, Semantic-Web-Technologien für die Bearbeitung und Repräsentation einzusetzen und sich mit anderen Vokabularen zu vernetzen. Ein produktiver Austausch fand mit den Produzenten anderer europäischer und internationaler Vokabulare (z.B. United Nations oder FAO) sowie Vertretern aus Projekten, die an Themen über automatische Indexierung (hier insbesondere parlamentarische und rechtliche Dokumente) sowie Interoperabilitiät zwischen Vokabularen arbeiten, statt.
- Source
- Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 62(2011) H.2/3, S.125-126
- Type
- a
-
Petras, V.; Bank, M.: Vergleich der Suchmaschinen AltaVista und HotBot bezüglich Treffermengen und Aktualität (1998)
0.00
0.0047055925 = product of:
0.011763981 = sum of:
0.005448922 = weight(_text_:a in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005448922 = score(doc=2514,freq=2.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
0.006315058 = product of:
0.012630116 = sum of:
0.012630116 = weight(_text_:information in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012630116 = score(doc=2514,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Source
- nfd Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 49(1998) H.8, S.453-458
- Type
- a
-
Stiller, J.; Gäde, M.; Petras, V.: Multilingual access to digital libraries : the Europeana use case (2013)
0.00
0.0041173934 = product of:
0.010293484 = sum of:
0.004767807 = weight(_text_:a in 902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.004767807 = score(doc=902,freq=2.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.089176424 = fieldWeight in 902, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=902)
0.005525676 = product of:
0.011051352 = sum of:
0.011051352 = weight(_text_:information in 902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011051352 = score(doc=902,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 902, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=902)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Source
- Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 64(2013) H.2/3, S.86-95
- Type
- a
-
Mayr, P.; Petras, V.: Crosskonkordanzen : Terminologie Mapping und deren Effektivität für das Information Retrieval
0.00
0.0011051352 = product of:
0.005525676 = sum of:
0.005525676 = product of:
0.011051352 = sum of:
0.011051352 = weight(_text_:information in 1996) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011051352 = score(doc=1996,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 1996, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1996)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
-
Menzel, S.; Schnaitter, H.; Zinck, J.; Petras, V.; Neudecker, C.; Labusch, K.; Leitner, E.; Rehm, G.: Named Entity Linking mit Wikidata und GND : das Potenzial handkuratierter und strukturierter Datenquellen für die semantische Anreicherung von Volltexten (2021)
0.00
6.8111526E-4 = product of:
0.0034055763 = sum of:
0.0034055763 = weight(_text_:a in 373) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0034055763 = score(doc=373,freq=2.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.06369744 = fieldWeight in 373, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=373)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Type
- a
