Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)
-
×
author_ss:"Pettigrew, K.E."
-
×
author_ss:"Wilkinson, M.A."
-
×
theme_ss:"Informationsdienstleistungen"
-
Wilkinson, M.A.; Pettigrew, K.E.: Control of community information : an analysis of roles (1996)
0.00
0.0022038904 = product of: 0.0044077807 = sum of: 0.0044077807 = product of: 0.008815561 = sum of: 0.008815561 = weight(_text_:a in 6953) [ClassicSimilarity], result of: 0.008815561 = score(doc=6953,freq=4.0), product of: 0.06116359 = queryWeight, product of: 1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218) 0.053045183 = queryNorm 0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 6953, product of: 2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of: 4.0 = termFreq=4.0 1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218) 0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6953) 0.5 = coord(1/2) 0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Explores the differences between information and referral agencies and online community networks from an information policy perspective and uses a framework proposed by Wilkinson (1992) to analyze the positioning of control within the 2 intermediaries under 6 facets: agency ownership and governance, funding, information flow, access, information ownership, and quality control. Existing community networks and information and referral agencies are used as examples to illustrate the arguments
- Type
- a
-
Pettigrew, K.E.; Wilkinson, M.A.: Controlling the quality of community information : an analysis of the effects on dissemination of the differences between I&R agencies and community networks (1994)
0.00
0.0019284041 = product of: 0.0038568082 = sum of: 0.0038568082 = product of: 0.0077136164 = sum of: 0.0077136164 = weight(_text_:a in 4006) [ClassicSimilarity], result of: 0.0077136164 = score(doc=4006,freq=4.0), product of: 0.06116359 = queryWeight, product of: 1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218) 0.053045183 = queryNorm 0.12611452 = fieldWeight in 4006, product of: 2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of: 4.0 = termFreq=4.0 1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218) 0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4006) 0.5 = coord(1/2) 0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The recent explosion of community networks, such as Freenets, across North America has prompted the information and referral community to question whether community networks are providing, in part, a duplicate service; what the implications of their growth might be in terms of service delivery to the public; and whether their expansion might threaten the security of support for I&R agencies. Examines an aspect of the nascent rivalry between community networks and I&R agencies: how they differ in their control mechanisms and consequent management of community information. Suggests ways the 2 types of organizations can work together to provide the public with accurate and comprehensive community information
- Type
- a