Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)
- Did you mean:
- rvk_ss%3a%2200 80852 allgemeinen %2f buch- und bibliothekswesen%2c informationswissenschaft %2f bibliothekswesen %2f bibliothekswesen in einzelnen L%c3%aendern und einzelne bibliotheken %2f einzelne deutsche bibliotheken %2f bibliotheken S %2f stuttgart %2f university%c3%A4tsbibliothek hohenheim%22 2
- rvk_ss%3a%2200 80852 allgemeines %2f buch- und bibliothekswesen%2c informationswissenschaft %2f bibliothekswesen %2f bibliothekswesen in einzelnen L%c3%aendern und einzelne bibliotheken %2f einzelne deutsche bibliotheken %2f bibliotheken S %2f stutttgart %2f university%c3%A4tsbibliothek hohenheim%22 2
- rvk_ss%3a%2200 80852 allgemeines %2f buch- und bibliothekswesen%2c informationswissenschaft %2f bibliothekswesen %2f bibliothekswesen in einzelnen L%c3%aendern und einzelne bibliotheken %2f einzelnen deutsche bibliotheken %2f bibliotheken S %2f stuttgart %2f university%c3%A4tsbibliothek hohenheim%22 2
- rvk_ss%3a%2200 80852 allgemeines %2f buch- und bibliothekswesen%2c informationswissenschaft %2f bibliothekswesen %2f bibliothekswesen in einzelnen L%c3%andern und einzelne bibliotheken %2f einzelne deutsche bibliotheken %2f bibliotheken S %2f stuttgart %2f university%c3%A4tsbibliothek hohenheim%22 2
- rvk_ss%3a%2200 8852 allgemeines %2f buch- und bibliothekswesen%2c informationswissenschaft %2f bibliothekswesen %2f bibliothekswesen in einzelnen L%c3%aendern und einzelne bibliotheken %2f einzelne deutsche bibliotheken %2f bibliotheken S %2f stuttgart %2f university%c3%A4tsbibliothek hohenheim%22 2
-
Pinto, M.: Abstracting/abstract adaptation to digital environments : research trends (2003)
0.00
4.3878658E-4 = product of: 0.006581798 = sum of: 0.004808274 = weight(_text_:in in 4446) [ClassicSimilarity], result of: 0.004808274 = score(doc=4446,freq=6.0), product of: 0.03078592 = queryWeight, product of: 1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218) 0.02263247 = queryNorm 0.1561842 = fieldWeight in 4446, product of: 2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of: 6.0 = termFreq=6.0 1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218) 0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4446) 0.0017735242 = weight(_text_:s in 4446) [ClassicSimilarity], result of: 0.0017735242 = score(doc=4446,freq=2.0), product of: 0.024606872 = queryWeight, product of: 1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218) 0.02263247 = queryNorm 0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 4446, product of: 1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of: 2.0 = termFreq=2.0 1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218) 0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4446) 0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
- Abstract
- The technological revolution is affecting the structure, form and content of documents, reducing the effectiveness of traditional abstracts that, to some extent, are inadequate to the new documentary conditions. Aims to show the directions in which abstracting/abstracts can evolve to achieve the necessary adequacy in the new digital environments. Three researching trends are proposed: theoretical, methodological and pragmatic. Theoretically, there are some needs for expanding the document concept, reengineering abstracting and designing interdisciplinary models. Methodologically, the trend is toward the structuring, automating and qualifying of the abstracts. Pragmatically, abstracts networking, combined with alternative and complementary models, open a new and promising horizon. Automating, structuring and qualifying abstracting/abstract offer some short-term prospects for progress. Concludes that reengineering, networking and visualising would be middle-term fruitful areas of research toward the full adequacy of abstracting in the new electronic age.
- Source
- Journal of documentation. 59(2003) no.5, S.581-608
-
Pinto, M.: Engineering the production of meta-information : the abstracting concern (2003)
0.00
1.3794079E-4 = product of: 0.0041382234 = sum of: 0.0041382234 = weight(_text_:s in 4667) [ClassicSimilarity], result of: 0.0041382234 = score(doc=4667,freq=2.0), product of: 0.024606872 = queryWeight, product of: 1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218) 0.02263247 = queryNorm 0.16817348 = fieldWeight in 4667, product of: 1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of: 2.0 = termFreq=2.0 1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218) 0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4667) 0.033333335 = coord(1/30)
- Source
- Journal of information science. 29(2003) no.5, S.405-418