-
Prathap, G.: ¬The thermodynamics-bibliometrics consilience and the meaning of h-type indices (2012)
0.02
0.020341193 = product of:
0.040682387 = sum of:
0.040682387 = product of:
0.061023578 = sum of:
0.008065818 = weight(_text_:a in 4990) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008065818 = score(doc=4990,freq=2.0), product of:
0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 4990, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4990)
0.052957762 = weight(_text_:h in 4990) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052957762 = score(doc=4990,freq=4.0), product of:
0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.4658342 = fieldWeight in 4990, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4990)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Object
- h-index
- Type
- a
-
Prathap, G.: ¬The inconsistency of the H-index (2012)
0.02
0.020341193 = product of:
0.040682387 = sum of:
0.040682387 = product of:
0.061023578 = sum of:
0.008065818 = weight(_text_:a in 287) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008065818 = score(doc=287,freq=2.0), product of:
0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 287, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=287)
0.052957762 = weight(_text_:h in 287) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052957762 = score(doc=287,freq=4.0), product of:
0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.4658342 = fieldWeight in 287, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=287)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Object
- h-index
- Type
- a
-
Prathap, G.: ¬A thermodynamic explanation for the Glänzel-Schubert model for the h-index (2011)
0.02
0.020227827 = product of:
0.040455654 = sum of:
0.040455654 = product of:
0.06068348 = sum of:
0.010754423 = weight(_text_:a in 4453) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010754423 = score(doc=4453,freq=8.0), product of:
0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 4453, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4453)
0.04992906 = weight(_text_:h in 4453) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04992906 = score(doc=4453,freq=8.0), product of:
0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.4391927 = fieldWeight in 4453, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4453)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Recently, it was shown that among existing theoretical models for the h-index, the Glänzel-Schubert model provides the best fit for a chosen example involving the research evaluation of universities. In this brief communication, we propose a thermodynamic explanation for the success of the Glänzel-Schubert model of the h-index.
- Object
- h-index
- Type
- a
-
Prathap, G.: ¬The zynergy-index and the formula for the h-index (2014)
0.02
0.017998088 = product of:
0.035996176 = sum of:
0.035996176 = product of:
0.05399426 = sum of:
0.010754423 = weight(_text_:a in 1207) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010754423 = score(doc=1207,freq=8.0), product of:
0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 1207, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1207)
0.043239836 = weight(_text_:h in 1207) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043239836 = score(doc=1207,freq=6.0), product of:
0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.38035205 = fieldWeight in 1207, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1207)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The h-index, as originally proposed (Hirsch, 2005), is a purely heuristic construction. Burrell (2013) showed that efforts to derive formulae from the mathematical framework of Lotkaian informetrics could lead to misleading results. On this note, we argue that a simple heuristic "thermodynamical" model can enable a better three-dimensional (3D) evaluation of the information production process leading to what we call the zynergy-index.
- Object
- h-index
- Type
- a
-
Prathap, G.: Measures for impact, consistency, and the h- and g-indices (2014)
0.02
0.015353201 = product of:
0.030706402 = sum of:
0.030706402 = product of:
0.0460596 = sum of:
0.010754423 = weight(_text_:a in 1250) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010754423 = score(doc=1250,freq=8.0), product of:
0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 1250, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1250)
0.035305176 = weight(_text_:h in 1250) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035305176 = score(doc=1250,freq=4.0), product of:
0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.31055614 = fieldWeight in 1250, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1250)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- An altogether different view on the properties of a good performance measure than that given in Egghe (2012) is offered. Egghe argued that a good impact measure should reward nonconsistency; that is, the more citations over papers are unequally distributed, the higher the impact should be. Here, a quantitative proxy for consistency is offered, and it is shown that as consistency increases, the ideal performance measure, which is sensitive to changes in consistency, should increase, reflecting this virtue.
- Object
- h-index
- Type
- a
-
Prathap, G.: ¬A three-class, three-dimensional bibliometric performance indicator (2014)
0.00
0.0019403342 = product of:
0.0038806684 = sum of:
0.0038806684 = product of:
0.011642005 = sum of:
0.011642005 = weight(_text_:a in 1308) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011642005 = score(doc=1308,freq=6.0), product of:
0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.22065444 = fieldWeight in 1308, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1308)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- In this brief communication, we show how a simple 3D bibliometric performance evaluation based on the zynergy-index (Prathap, 2013) can be simplified by the recently introduced 3-class approach (Ye & Leydesdorff, in press).
- Type
- a
-
Prathap, G.: Quantity, quality, and consistency as bibliometric indicators (2014)
0.00
0.001344303 = product of:
0.002688606 = sum of:
0.002688606 = product of:
0.008065818 = sum of:
0.008065818 = weight(_text_:a in 1178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008065818 = score(doc=1178,freq=2.0), product of:
0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 1178, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1178)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Type
- a
-
Prathap, G.: Measures for bibliometric size, impact, and concentration (2015)
0.00
0.001344303 = product of:
0.002688606 = sum of:
0.002688606 = product of:
0.008065818 = sum of:
0.008065818 = weight(_text_:a in 2046) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008065818 = score(doc=2046,freq=2.0), product of:
0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 2046, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2046)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Type
- a
-
Prathap, G.: Fractionalized exergy for evaluating research performance (2011)
0.00
8.9620193E-4 = product of:
0.0017924039 = sum of:
0.0017924039 = product of:
0.0053772116 = sum of:
0.0053772116 = weight(_text_:a in 4918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0053772116 = score(doc=4918,freq=2.0), product of:
0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 4918, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4918)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Type
- a