-
Prathap, G.: ¬The zynergy-index and the formula for the h-index (2014)
0.01
0.007931474 = product of:
0.019828685 = sum of:
0.010897844 = weight(_text_:a in 1207) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010897844 = score(doc=1207,freq=8.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 1207, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1207)
0.0089308405 = product of:
0.017861681 = sum of:
0.017861681 = weight(_text_:information in 1207) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017861681 = score(doc=1207,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 1207, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1207)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- The h-index, as originally proposed (Hirsch, 2005), is a purely heuristic construction. Burrell (2013) showed that efforts to derive formulae from the mathematical framework of Lotkaian informetrics could lead to misleading results. On this note, we argue that a simple heuristic "thermodynamical" model can enable a better three-dimensional (3D) evaluation of the information production process leading to what we call the zynergy-index.
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.2, S.426-427
- Type
- a
-
Prathap, G.: ¬A three-class, three-dimensional bibliometric performance indicator (2014)
0.01
0.007876435 = product of:
0.019691087 = sum of:
0.011797264 = weight(_text_:a in 1308) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011797264 = score(doc=1308,freq=6.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.22065444 = fieldWeight in 1308, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1308)
0.007893822 = product of:
0.015787644 = sum of:
0.015787644 = weight(_text_:information in 1308) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015787644 = score(doc=1308,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 1308, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1308)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- In this brief communication, we show how a simple 3D bibliometric performance evaluation based on the zynergy-index (Prathap, 2013) can be simplified by the recently introduced 3-class approach (Ye & Leydesdorff, in press).
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.7, S.1506-1508
- Type
- a
-
Prathap, G.: ¬The thermodynamics-bibliometrics consilience and the meaning of h-type indices (2012)
0.01
0.007058388 = product of:
0.01764597 = sum of:
0.008173384 = weight(_text_:a in 4990) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008173384 = score(doc=4990,freq=2.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 4990, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4990)
0.009472587 = product of:
0.018945174 = sum of:
0.018945174 = weight(_text_:information in 4990) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018945174 = score(doc=4990,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 4990, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4990)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.2, S.430
- Type
- a
-
Prathap, G.: ¬The inconsistency of the H-index (2012)
0.01
0.007058388 = product of:
0.01764597 = sum of:
0.008173384 = weight(_text_:a in 287) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008173384 = score(doc=287,freq=2.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 287, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=287)
0.009472587 = product of:
0.018945174 = sum of:
0.018945174 = weight(_text_:information in 287) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018945174 = score(doc=287,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 287, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=287)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.7, S.1466-1470
- Type
- a
-
Prathap, G.: Quantity, quality, and consistency as bibliometric indicators (2014)
0.01
0.007058388 = product of:
0.01764597 = sum of:
0.008173384 = weight(_text_:a in 1178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008173384 = score(doc=1178,freq=2.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 1178, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1178)
0.009472587 = product of:
0.018945174 = sum of:
0.018945174 = weight(_text_:information in 1178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018945174 = score(doc=1178,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 1178, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1178)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.1, S.214
- Type
- a
-
Prathap, G.: Measures for bibliometric size, impact, and concentration (2015)
0.01
0.007058388 = product of:
0.01764597 = sum of:
0.008173384 = weight(_text_:a in 2046) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008173384 = score(doc=2046,freq=2.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 2046, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2046)
0.009472587 = product of:
0.018945174 = sum of:
0.018945174 = weight(_text_:information in 2046) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018945174 = score(doc=2046,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 2046, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2046)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 66(2015) no.8, S.1740-1741
- Type
- a
-
Prathap, G.: ¬A thermodynamic explanation for the Glänzel-Schubert model for the h-index (2011)
0.01
0.0068851607 = product of:
0.017212901 = sum of:
0.010897844 = weight(_text_:a in 4453) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010897844 = score(doc=4453,freq=8.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 4453, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4453)
0.006315058 = product of:
0.012630116 = sum of:
0.012630116 = weight(_text_:information in 4453) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012630116 = score(doc=4453,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 4453, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4453)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Recently, it was shown that among existing theoretical models for the h-index, the Glänzel-Schubert model provides the best fit for a chosen example involving the research evaluation of universities. In this brief communication, we propose a thermodynamic explanation for the success of the Glänzel-Schubert model of the h-index.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.5, S.992-994
- Type
- a
-
Prathap, G.: Measures for impact, consistency, and the h- and g-indices (2014)
0.01
0.0068851607 = product of:
0.017212901 = sum of:
0.010897844 = weight(_text_:a in 1250) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010897844 = score(doc=1250,freq=8.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 1250, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1250)
0.006315058 = product of:
0.012630116 = sum of:
0.012630116 = weight(_text_:information in 1250) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012630116 = score(doc=1250,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 1250, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1250)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- An altogether different view on the properties of a good performance measure than that given in Egghe (2012) is offered. Egghe argued that a good impact measure should reward nonconsistency; that is, the more citations over papers are unequally distributed, the higher the impact should be. Here, a quantitative proxy for consistency is offered, and it is shown that as consistency increases, the ideal performance measure, which is sensitive to changes in consistency, should increase, reflecting this virtue.
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.5, S.1076-1078
- Type
- a
-
Prathap, G.: Fractionalized exergy for evaluating research performance (2011)
0.00
0.0047055925 = product of:
0.011763981 = sum of:
0.005448922 = weight(_text_:a in 4918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005448922 = score(doc=4918,freq=2.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 4918, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4918)
0.006315058 = product of:
0.012630116 = sum of:
0.012630116 = weight(_text_:information in 4918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012630116 = score(doc=4918,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 4918, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4918)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.11, S.2294-2295
- Type
- a
