Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)
- Did you mean:
- author's%3a%22Huang%2c J. xiangji %3d%3E xiangji huang%2c J.%22 2
- author's%3a%22Huang%2c J. xiang %3d%3E xiangji huang%2c J.%22 2
- author's%3a%22Huang%2c J. xiangji %3d%3E xiang huang%2c J.%22 2
- author's%3a%22Huang%2c J. xiangji %3d%3E xiangji hwang%2c J.%22 2
- authors%3a%22Huang%2c J. xiangji %3d%3E xiangji huang%2c J.%22 2
-
Prathap, G.: ¬A three-class, three-dimensional bibliometric performance indicator (2014)
0.01
0.012333787 = product of: 0.08633651 = sum of: 0.08633651 = product of: 0.17267302 = sum of: 0.17267302 = weight(_text_:3d in 1308) [ClassicSimilarity], result of: 0.17267302 = score(doc=1308,freq=2.0), product of: 0.21879539 = queryWeight, product of: 7.14301 = idf(docFreq=94, maxDocs=44218) 0.030630698 = queryNorm 0.7891986 = fieldWeight in 1308, product of: 1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of: 2.0 = termFreq=2.0 7.14301 = idf(docFreq=94, maxDocs=44218) 0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1308) 0.5 = coord(1/2) 0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- In this brief communication, we show how a simple 3D bibliometric performance evaluation based on the zynergy-index (Prathap, 2013) can be simplified by the recently introduced 3-class approach (Ye & Leydesdorff, in press).
-
Prathap, G.: ¬The zynergy-index and the formula for the h-index (2014)
0.01
0.00986703 = product of: 0.06906921 = sum of: 0.06906921 = product of: 0.13813841 = sum of: 0.13813841 = weight(_text_:3d in 1207) [ClassicSimilarity], result of: 0.13813841 = score(doc=1207,freq=2.0), product of: 0.21879539 = queryWeight, product of: 7.14301 = idf(docFreq=94, maxDocs=44218) 0.030630698 = queryNorm 0.63135886 = fieldWeight in 1207, product of: 1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of: 2.0 = termFreq=2.0 7.14301 = idf(docFreq=94, maxDocs=44218) 0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1207) 0.5 = coord(1/2) 0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- The h-index, as originally proposed (Hirsch, 2005), is a purely heuristic construction. Burrell (2013) showed that efforts to derive formulae from the mathematical framework of Lotkaian informetrics could lead to misleading results. On this note, we argue that a simple heuristic "thermodynamical" model can enable a better three-dimensional (3D) evaluation of the information production process leading to what we call the zynergy-index.