Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Prathap, G."
  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Prathap, G.: ¬A three-class, three-dimensional bibliometric performance indicator (2014) 0.00 
    0.0021034614 = product of:
  0.012620768 = sum of:
    0.012620768 = weight(_text_:in in 1308) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012620768 = score(doc=1308,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.21253976 = fieldWeight in 1308, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1308)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    In this brief communication, we show how a simple 3D bibliometric performance evaluation based on the zynergy-index (Prathap, 2013) can be simplified by the recently introduced 3-class approach (Ye & Leydesdorff, in press).
  2. Prathap, G.: Measures for impact, consistency, and the h- and g-indices (2014) 0.00 
    0.001682769 = product of:
  0.010096614 = sum of:
    0.010096614 = weight(_text_:in in 1250) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010096614 = score(doc=1250,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.17003182 = fieldWeight in 1250, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1250)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    An altogether different view on the properties of a good performance measure than that given in Egghe (2012) is offered. Egghe argued that a good impact measure should reward nonconsistency; that is, the more citations over papers are unequally distributed, the higher the impact should be. Here, a quantitative proxy for consistency is offered, and it is shown that as consistency increases, the ideal performance measure, which is sensitive to changes in consistency, should increase, reflecting this virtue.
  3. Prathap, G.: ¬A thermodynamic explanation for the Glänzel-Schubert model for the h-index (2011) 0.00 
    0.0011898974 = product of:
  0.0071393843 = sum of:
    0.0071393843 = weight(_text_:in in 4453) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0071393843 = score(doc=4453,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.120230645 = fieldWeight in 4453, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4453)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Recently, it was shown that among existing theoretical models for the h-index, the Glänzel-Schubert model provides the best fit for a chosen example involving the research evaluation of universities. In this brief communication, we propose a thermodynamic explanation for the success of the Glänzel-Schubert model of the h-index.