Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Rügenhagen, M."
  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × year_i:[2020 TO 2030}
  1. Rügenhagen, M.; Beck, T.S.; Sartorius, E.J.: Information integrity in the era of Fake News : ein neuer Studienschwerpunkt für wissenschaftliche Bibliotheken und Forschungseinrichtungen (2020) 0.04
    0.043744322 = product of:
      0.087488644 = sum of:
        0.087488644 = product of:
          0.17497729 = sum of:
            0.17497729 = weight(_text_:news in 5858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.17497729 = score(doc=5858,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.26705483 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.2416887 = idf(docFreq=635, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05094824 = queryNorm
                0.6552111 = fieldWeight in 5858, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.2416887 = idf(docFreq=635, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5858)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    In this article we report on an experiment that tested how useful library-based guidelines are for measuring the integrity of information in the era of fake news. We found that the usefulness of these guidelines depends on at least three factors: weighting indicators (criteria), clear instructions, and context-specificity.
  2. Rügenhagen, M.; Beck, T.S.; Sartorius, E.J.: Information integrity in the era of Fake News : an experiment using library guidelines to judge information integrity (2020) 0.04
    0.043744322 = product of:
      0.087488644 = sum of:
        0.087488644 = product of:
          0.17497729 = sum of:
            0.17497729 = weight(_text_:news in 113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.17497729 = score(doc=113,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.26705483 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.2416887 = idf(docFreq=635, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05094824 = queryNorm
                0.6552111 = fieldWeight in 113, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.2416887 = idf(docFreq=635, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=113)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    In this article we report on an experiment that tested how useful library-based guidelines are for measuring the integrity of information in the era of fake news. We found that the usefulness of these guidelines depends on at least three factors: weighting indicators (criteria), clear instructions, and context-specificity.