Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Rügenhagen, M."
  • × theme_ss:"Internet"
  • × year_i:[2020 TO 2030}
  1. Rügenhagen, M.; Beck, T.S.; Sartorius, E.J.: Information integrity in the era of Fake News : ein neuer Studienschwerpunkt für wissenschaftliche Bibliotheken und Forschungseinrichtungen (2020) 0.02 
    0.015892744 = product of:
  0.07946372 = sum of:
    0.017679956 = weight(_text_:und in 5858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017679956 = score(doc=5858,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.27704588 = fieldWeight in 5858, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5858)
    0.03594769 = product of:
      0.07189538 = sum of:
        0.07189538 = weight(_text_:kommunikationswissenschaften in 5858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07189538 = score(doc=5858,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15303716 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.46979034 = fieldWeight in 5858, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5858)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.017679956 = weight(_text_:und in 5858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017679956 = score(doc=5858,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.27704588 = fieldWeight in 5858, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5858)
    0.0081561245 = weight(_text_:in in 5858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0081561245 = score(doc=5858,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.2082456 = fieldWeight in 5858, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5858)
  0.2 = coord(4/20)
    Abstract
    In this article we report on an experiment that tested how useful library-based guidelines are for measuring the integrity of information in the era of fake news. We found that the usefulness of these guidelines depends on at least three factors: weighting indicators (criteria), clear instructions, and context-specificity.
    Field
    Kommunikationswissenschaften
    Source
    Bibliothek: Forschung und Praxis. 44(2020) H.1, S.255-261
  2. Rügenhagen, M.; Beck, T.S.; Sartorius, E.J.: Information integrity in the era of Fake News : an experiment using library guidelines to judge information integrity (2020) 0.01 
    0.01382141 = product of:
  0.06910705 = sum of:
    0.012501617 = weight(_text_:und in 113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012501617 = score(doc=113,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.19590102 = fieldWeight in 113, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=113)
    0.03594769 = product of:
      0.07189538 = sum of:
        0.07189538 = weight(_text_:kommunikationswissenschaften in 113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07189538 = score(doc=113,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15303716 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.46979034 = fieldWeight in 113, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=113)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.012501617 = weight(_text_:und in 113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012501617 = score(doc=113,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.19590102 = fieldWeight in 113, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=113)
    0.0081561245 = weight(_text_:in in 113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0081561245 = score(doc=113,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.2082456 = fieldWeight in 113, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=113)
  0.2 = coord(4/20)
    Abstract
    In this article we report on an experiment that tested how useful library-based guidelines are for measuring the integrity of information in the era of fake news. We found that the usefulness of these guidelines depends on at least three factors: weighting indicators (criteria), clear instructions, and context-specificity.
    Field
    Kommunikationswissenschaften
    Source
    Bibliothek: Forschung und Praxis. 44(2020) H.1, S.34-53

Authors