-
You, G.-N:; Rada, R.: ¬A systematic approach to outline manipulation (1994)
0.07
0.07172854 = product of:
0.21518563 = sum of:
0.21518563 = weight(_text_:systematic in 2010) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.21518563 = score(doc=2010,freq=2.0), product of:
0.28397155 = queryWeight, product of:
5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.7577718 = fieldWeight in 2010, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2010)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
-
Rada, R.: Maintaining thesauri and metathesauri (1990)
0.01
0.009384007 = product of:
0.02815202 = sum of:
0.02815202 = product of:
0.05630404 = sum of:
0.05630404 = weight(_text_:indexing in 2223) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05630404 = score(doc=2223,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.29604656 = fieldWeight in 2223, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2223)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Maintaining a thesaurus is a time-consuming task which should go hand-in-hand with the indexing of information and should be supported by software. To connect different document databases their respective thesauri should be related. The most straightforward way to support to support this by computer is to map the terms of one thesaurus to those of another. Such a mapping creates one kind of metathesaurus. As citation systems are extended to include full-text online, a new thesaurus may be used to index individual paragraphs. To illustrate these principles several computer systems are described which help people maintain thesauri and metathesauri. Particular success has been had by the National Library of Medicine with its Medical Subject Headings and its Unified Medical Language System
-
Rada, R.: Hypertext and paper : a special synergy (1991)
0.01
0.008975455 = product of:
0.026926363 = sum of:
0.026926363 = product of:
0.053852726 = sum of:
0.053852726 = weight(_text_:22 in 4915) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053852726 = score(doc=4915,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17398734 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4915, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4915)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- International journal of information management. 11(1991) no.1, S.14-22
