Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Rafferty, P."
  • × theme_ss:"Social tagging"
  1. Rafferty, P.; Hidderley, R.: Flickr and democratic Indexing : dialogic approaches to indexing (2007) 0.02
    0.020352896 = sum of:
      0.018274104 = product of:
        0.07309642 = sum of:
          0.07309642 = weight(_text_:authors in 752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07309642 = score(doc=752,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.2418733 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.053056188 = queryNorm
              0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 752, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=752)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.0020787928 = product of:
        0.0041575856 = sum of:
          0.0041575856 = weight(_text_:s in 752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0041575856 = score(doc=752,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.057684682 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.053056188 = queryNorm
              0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 752, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=752)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The purpose of this paper is two-fold: to examine three models of subject indexing (i.e. expert-led indexing, author-generated indexing, and user-orientated indexing); and to compare and contrast two user-orientated indexing approaches (i.e. the theoretically-based Democratic Indexing project, and Flickr, a working system for describing photographs). Design/methodology/approach - The approach to examining Flickr and Democratic Indexing is evaluative. The limitations of Flickr are described and examples are provided. The Democratic Indexing approach, which the authors believe offers a method of marshalling a "free" user-indexed archive to provide useful retrieval functions, is described. Findings - The examination of both Flickr and the Democratic Indexing approach suggests that, despite Shirky's claim of philosophical paradigm shifting for social tagging, there is a residing doubt amongst information professionals that self-organising systems can work without there being some element of control and some form of "representative authority". Originality/value - This paper contributes to the literature of user-based indexing and social tagging.
    Source
    Aslib proceedings. 59(2007) no.4/5, S.397-410
  2. Hidderley, R.; Rafferty, P.: Flickr and democratic indexing : disciplining desire lines (2006) 0.00
    0.0012126293 = product of:
      0.0024252585 = sum of:
        0.0024252585 = product of:
          0.004850517 = sum of:
            0.004850517 = weight(_text_:s in 119) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.004850517 = score(doc=119,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.057684682 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.053056188 = queryNorm
                0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 119, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=119)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S.405-411
  3. Rafferty, P.: Tagging (2018) 0.00
    0.0012126293 = product of:
      0.0024252585 = sum of:
        0.0024252585 = product of:
          0.004850517 = sum of:
            0.004850517 = weight(_text_:s in 4647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.004850517 = score(doc=4647,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.057684682 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.053056188 = queryNorm
                0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 4647, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4647)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 45(2018) no.6, S.500-516
  4. Ransom, N.; Rafferty, P.: Facets of user-assigned tags and their effectiveness in image retrieval (2011) 0.00
    8.6616375E-4 = product of:
      0.0017323275 = sum of:
        0.0017323275 = product of:
          0.003464655 = sum of:
            0.003464655 = weight(_text_:s in 296) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.003464655 = score(doc=296,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.057684682 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.053056188 = queryNorm
                0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 296, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=296)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 67(2011) no.6, S.1038-1066
  5. Rafferty, P.; Murphy, H.: Is there nothing outside the tags? : towards a poststructuralist analysis of social tagging (2015) 0.00
    8.6616375E-4 = product of:
      0.0017323275 = sum of:
        0.0017323275 = product of:
          0.003464655 = sum of:
            0.003464655 = weight(_text_:s in 1792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.003464655 = score(doc=1792,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.057684682 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.053056188 = queryNorm
                0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 1792, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1792)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 71(2015) no.3, S.477-502