Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Rafferty, P."
  1. Rafferty, P.: ¬The representation of knowledge in library classification schemes (2001) 0.02
    0.020112071 = product of:
      0.10056035 = sum of:
        0.033520117 = weight(_text_:23 in 640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033520117 = score(doc=640,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09976059 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027834523 = queryNorm
            0.3360056 = fieldWeight in 640, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=640)
        0.033520117 = weight(_text_:23 in 640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033520117 = score(doc=640,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09976059 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027834523 = queryNorm
            0.3360056 = fieldWeight in 640, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=640)
        0.033520117 = weight(_text_:23 in 640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033520117 = score(doc=640,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09976059 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027834523 = queryNorm
            0.3360056 = fieldWeight in 640, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=640)
      0.2 = coord(3/15)
    
    Date
    23. 6.2002 11:23:20
  2. Rafferty, P.: Genre theory, knowledge organisation and fiction 0.01
    0.0118511515 = product of:
      0.059255756 = sum of:
        0.01975192 = weight(_text_:23 in 3541) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01975192 = score(doc=3541,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09976059 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027834523 = queryNorm
            0.1979932 = fieldWeight in 3541, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3541)
        0.01975192 = weight(_text_:23 in 3541) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01975192 = score(doc=3541,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09976059 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027834523 = queryNorm
            0.1979932 = fieldWeight in 3541, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3541)
        0.01975192 = weight(_text_:23 in 3541) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01975192 = score(doc=3541,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09976059 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027834523 = queryNorm
            0.1979932 = fieldWeight in 3541, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3541)
      0.2 = coord(3/15)
    
    Source
    Paradigms and conceptual systems in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the Eleventh International ISKO conference, Rome, 23-26 February 2010, ed. Claudio Gnoli, Indeks, Frankfurt M
  3. Inskip, C.; MacFarlane, A.; Rafferty, P.: Organising music for movies (2010) 0.01
    0.0118511515 = product of:
      0.059255756 = sum of:
        0.01975192 = weight(_text_:23 in 3941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01975192 = score(doc=3941,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09976059 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027834523 = queryNorm
            0.1979932 = fieldWeight in 3941, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3941)
        0.01975192 = weight(_text_:23 in 3941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01975192 = score(doc=3941,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09976059 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027834523 = queryNorm
            0.1979932 = fieldWeight in 3941, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3941)
        0.01975192 = weight(_text_:23 in 3941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01975192 = score(doc=3941,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09976059 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027834523 = queryNorm
            0.1979932 = fieldWeight in 3941, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3941)
      0.2 = coord(3/15)
    
    Date
    29. 8.2010 12:23:57
  4. Rafferty, P.: Genette, intertextuality, and knowledge organization (2014) 0.00
    5.028259E-4 = product of:
      0.0075423876 = sum of:
        0.0075423876 = product of:
          0.022627162 = sum of:
            0.022627162 = weight(_text_:22 in 1445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022627162 = score(doc=1445,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09747176 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.027834523 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1445, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1445)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  5. Rafferty, P.: Tagging (2018) 0.00
    4.1694392E-4 = product of:
      0.0062541584 = sum of:
        0.0062541584 = product of:
          0.018762475 = sum of:
            0.018762475 = weight(_text_:internet in 4647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018762475 = score(doc=4647,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08217419 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.027834523 = queryNorm
                0.22832564 = fieldWeight in 4647, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4647)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Abstract
    This article examines tagging as knowledge organization. Tagging is a kind of indexing, a process of labelling and categorizing information made to support resource discovery for users. Social tagging generally means the practice whereby internet users generate keywords to describe, categorise or comment on digital content. The value of tagging comes when social tags within a collection are aggregated and shared through a folksonomy. This article examines definitions of tagging and folksonomy, and discusses the functions, advantages and disadvantages of tagging systems in relation to knowledge organization before discussing studies that have compared tagging and conventional library-based knowledge organization systems. Approaches to disciplining tagging practice are examined and tagger motivation discussed. Finally, the article outlines current research fronts.