Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Reid, J."
  1. Dunlop, M.D.; Johnson, C.W.; Reid, J.: Exploring the layers of information retrieval evaluation (1998) 0.00
    5.147861E-4 = product of:
      0.0077217915 = sum of:
        0.0077217915 = product of:
          0.015443583 = sum of:
            0.015443583 = weight(_text_:information in 3762) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.015443583 = score(doc=3762,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028978055 = queryNorm
                0.3035872 = fieldWeight in 3762, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3762)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Abstract
    Presents current work on modelling interactive information retrieval systems and users' interactions with them. Analyzes the papers in this special issue in the context of evaluation in information retrieval (IR) by examining the different layers at which IR use could be evaluated. IR poses the double evaluation problem of evaluating both the underlying system effectiveness and the overall ability of the system to aid users. The papers look at different issues in combining human-computer interaction (HCI) research with IR research and provide insights into the problem of evaluating the information seeking process
    Footnote
    Contribution to a special section of articles related to human-computer interaction and information retrieval
  2. Reid, J.; Lalmas, M.; Finesilver, K.; Hertzum, M.: Best entry points for structured document retrieval : part II: types, usage and effectiveness (2006) 0.00
    3.987516E-4 = product of:
      0.005981274 = sum of:
        0.005981274 = product of:
          0.011962548 = sum of:
            0.011962548 = weight(_text_:information in 961) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.011962548 = score(doc=961,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028978055 = queryNorm
                0.23515764 = fieldWeight in 961, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=961)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Abstract
    Structured document retrieval makes use of document components as the basis of the retrieval process, rather than complete documents. The inherent relationships between these components make it vital to support users' natural browsing behaviour in order to offer effective and efficient access to structured documents. This paper examines the concept of best entry points, which are document components from which the user can browse to obtain optimal access to relevant document components. It investigates at the types of best entry points in structured document retrieval, and their usage and effectiveness in real information search tasks.
    Footnote
    Beitrag innerhalb eines thematischen Schwerpunktes "Formal Methods for Information Retrieval"
    Source
    Information processing and management. 42(2006) no.1, S.89-105
  3. Reid, J.; Lalmas, M.; Finesilver, K.; Hertzum, M.: Best entry points for structured document retrieval : part I: characteristics (2006) 0.00
    3.255793E-4 = product of:
      0.0048836893 = sum of:
        0.0048836893 = product of:
          0.009767379 = sum of:
            0.009767379 = weight(_text_:information in 960) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009767379 = score(doc=960,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028978055 = queryNorm
                0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 960, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=960)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Footnote
    Beitrag innerhalb eines thematischen Schwerpunktes "Formal Methods for Information Retrieval"
    Source
    Information processing and management. 42(2006) no.1, S.74-88