-
Rieh, S.Y.; Xie, H.(I.): Analysis of multiple query reformulations on the web : the interactive information retrieval context (2006)
0.01
0.009073292 = product of:
0.018146584 = sum of:
0.018146584 = product of:
0.072586335 = sum of:
0.072586335 = weight(_text_:authors in 976) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.072586335 = score(doc=976,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24018547 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.052685954 = queryNorm
0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 976, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=976)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This study examines the facets and patterns of multiple Web query reformulations with a focus on reformulation sequences. Based on IR interaction models, it was presumed that query reformulation is the product of the interaction between the user and the IR system. Query reformulation also reflects the interplay between the surface and deeper levels of user interaction. Query logs were collected from a Web search engine through the selection of search sessions in which users submitted six or more unique queries per session. The final data set was composed of 313 search sessions. Three facets of query reformulation (content, format, and resource) as well as nine sub-facets were derived from the data. In addition, analysis of modification sequences identified eight distinct patterns: specified, generalized, parallel, building-block, dynamic, multitasking, recurrent, and format reformulation. Adapting Saracevic's stratified model, the authors develop a model of Web query reformulation based on the results of the study. The implications for Web search engine design are finally discussed and the functions of an interactive reformulation tool are suggested.
-
Hilligoss, B.; Rieh, S.Y.: Developing a unifying framework of credibility assessment : construct, heuristics, and interaction in context (2008)
0.01
0.009073292 = product of:
0.018146584 = sum of:
0.018146584 = product of:
0.072586335 = sum of:
0.072586335 = weight(_text_:authors in 2104) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.072586335 = score(doc=2104,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24018547 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.052685954 = queryNorm
0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 2104, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2104)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This article presents a unifying framework of credibility assessment in which credibility is characterized across a variety of media and resources with respect to diverse information seeking goals and tasks. The initial data were collected through information-activity diaries over a 10-day period from 24 undergraduate students at three different colleges. Based on 245 information seeking activities from the diaries, the authors conducted individual interviews with participants and analyzed the transcripts using a grounded theory analysis. Three distinct levels of credibility judgments emerged: construct, heuristics, and interaction. The construct level pertains to how a person constructs, conceptualizes, or defines credibility. The heuristics level involves general rules of thumb used to make judgments of credibility applicable to a variety of situations. Finally, the interaction level refers to credibility judgments based on content, peripheral source cues, and peripheral information object cues. In addition, context emerged as the social, relational and dynamic frames surrounding the information seeker and providing boundaries of credibility judgments. The implications of the framework in terms of its theoretical contribution to credibility research and practices are discussed.
-
Rieh, S.Y.; Kim, Y.-M.; Markey, K.: Amount of invested mental effort (AIME) in online searching (2012)
0.00
0.0045057517 = product of:
0.009011503 = sum of:
0.009011503 = product of:
0.018023007 = sum of:
0.018023007 = weight(_text_:m in 2726) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018023007 = score(doc=2726,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13110629 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.052685954 = queryNorm
0.13746867 = fieldWeight in 2726, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2726)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
