Search (6 results, page 1 of 1)

Riesthuis, G.J.A.: ¬The Universal Decimal Classification as a CDS/ISIS database (1991) 0.03

0.03472177 = product of:
  0.06944354 = sum of:
    0.06944354 = product of:
      0.20833062 = sum of:
        0.20833062 = weight(_text_:universal in 251) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.20833062 = score(doc=251,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25562882 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04851763 = queryNorm
            0.8149731 = fieldWeight in 251, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=251)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Riesthuis, G.J.A.: Fiction in need of transcending traditional classification (1997) 0.02

0.019841012 = product of:
  0.039682023 = sum of:
    0.039682023 = product of:
      0.11904607 = sum of:
        0.11904607 = weight(_text_:universal in 1808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11904607 = score(doc=1808,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25562882 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04851763 = queryNorm
            0.46569893 = fieldWeight in 1808, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1808)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract: Gives an overview of the classes for literature of the Library of Congress Classification scheme, the Dewey Decimal Classification scheme and the Universal Decimal Classification Scheme

Riesthuis, G.J.A.: Some thoughts about the format of the Master Reference File database (2000) 0.02

0.018592581 = product of:
  0.037185162 = sum of:
    0.037185162 = product of:
      0.11155548 = sum of:
        0.11155548 = weight(_text_:22 in 6405) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11155548 = score(doc=6405,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16990048 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04851763 = queryNorm
            0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 6405, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6405)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source: Extensions and corrections to the UDC. 22(2000), S.15-22

Riesthuis, G.J.A.; Stuurman, P.: Tendenzen in de onderwerpsontsluiting : T.3: Gecontroleerde informatietalen (1990) 0.02

0.015338095 = product of:
  0.03067619 = sum of:
    0.03067619 = product of:
      0.092028566 = sum of:
        0.092028566 = weight(_text_:22 in 210) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.092028566 = score(doc=210,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16990048 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04851763 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 210, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=210)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source: Open. 22(1990) no.1, S.11-15

Riesthuis, G.J.A.; Stuurman, P.: Tendenzen in de onderwerpsontsluiting : T.4: Onderwerpsontsluiting en on-line catalogi (1990) 0.02

0.015338095 = product of:
  0.03067619 = sum of:
    0.03067619 = product of:
      0.092028566 = sum of:
        0.092028566 = weight(_text_:22 in 211) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.092028566 = score(doc=211,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16990048 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04851763 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 211, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=211)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source: Open. 22(1990) no.10, S.326-330

Riesthuis, G.J.A.: Information languages and multilingual subject access (2003) 0.01
```
0.009920506 = product of:
  0.019841012 = sum of:
    0.019841012 = product of:
      0.059523035 = sum of:
        0.059523035 = weight(_text_:universal in 3963) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.059523035 = score(doc=3963,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25562882 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04851763 = queryNorm
            0.23284946 = fieldWeight in 3963, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3963)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
```
Content

"1. Introduction Multilingual and crosslingual access to information is receiving more and more attention. Maybe the most important reason for this development is the Internet. There are estimations that about half of its users are people with a mother tongue other than English and that this proportion is growing. Crosslingual access in this context means the possibility to get free text access to information using another (natural) language than the language of the information itself. This type of access is important for users with a good passive knowledge of a language but with only a small active vocabulary of the same language, e.g. a Englishman who can read Russian, but has difficulties in formulating adequate search request in that language. Crosslingual access can also be valuable for monolingual users who can automatically or manually have translations of foreign language documents. The search requests will be translated or converted into the language of the information. Multilingual access assumes that the instruments used for access, the controlled information languages, are available in more than one language. An classic example is the Englishman who uses his English edition of the Universal Decimal Classification to search the catalogue of a library in China, although the classification of the library is done using a Chinese edition. In this case the searching and the classifying results in a notation that is the same irrespective which language edition was used for indexing. Another possibility is the use of a multilingual thesaurus or subject headings list, such the trilingual edition of the Library of Congress Subject Headings built at the Royal Library in Brussels (Belgium) or the Macrothesaurus of the OECD. Here, words are the access points - in one language into which each search request will be converted, or, alternatively, into all the languages involved. Multilingual information languages and guidelines an how to build them are the subject of this paper. Particular attention will be paid to multilingual thesauri."

Search (6 results, page 1 of 1)

Years

Languages

Themes