Hocker, J.; Schindler, C.; Rittberger, M.: Participatory design for ontologies : a case study of an open science ontology for qualitative coding schemas (2020)
0.03
0.032066077 = sum of:
0.019071886 = product of:
0.076287545 = sum of:
0.076287545 = weight(_text_:authors in 179) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.076287545 = score(doc=179,freq=6.0), product of:
0.21861306 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.047953933 = queryNorm
0.34896153 = fieldWeight in 179, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=179)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.012994192 = product of:
0.025988383 = sum of:
0.025988383 = weight(_text_:22 in 179) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025988383 = score(doc=179,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1679265 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047953933 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 179, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=179)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Purpose The open science movement calls for transparent and retraceable research processes. While infrastructures to support these practices in qualitative research are lacking, the design needs to consider different approaches and workflows. The paper bases on the definition of ontologies as shared conceptualizations of knowledge (Borst, 1999). The authors argue that participatory design is a good way to create these shared conceptualizations by giving domain experts and future users a voice in the design process via interviews, workshops and observations. Design/methodology/approach This paper presents a novel approach for creating ontologies in the field of open science using participatory design. As a case study the creation of an ontology for qualitative coding schemas is presented. Coding schemas are an important result of qualitative research, and reuse can yield great potential for open science making qualitative research more transparent, enhance sharing of coding schemas and teaching of qualitative methods. The participatory design process consisted of three parts: a requirement analysis using interviews and an observation, a design phase accompanied by interviews and an evaluation phase based on user tests as well as interviews. Findings The research showed several positive outcomes due to participatory design: higher commitment of users, mutual learning, high quality feedback and better quality of the ontology. However, there are two obstacles in this approach: First, contradictive answers by the interviewees, which needs to be balanced; second, this approach takes more time due to interview planning and analysis. Practical implications The implication of the paper is in the long run to decentralize the design of open science infrastructures and to involve parties affected on several levels. Originality/value In ontology design, several methods exist by using user-centered design or participatory design doing workshops. In this paper, the authors outline the potentials for participatory design using mainly interviews in creating an ontology for open science. The authors focus on close contact to researchers in order to build the ontology upon the expert's knowledge.
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
