Search (1 results, page 1 of 1)

Did you mean:
rvk_ss%3a%2000 15860 allgemeines %2f medien- und kommunikationswissenschaften%2c kommunikationsdesign %2f firmen der kommunikation und des kommunikationsdesigns %2f kommunikationsdesign in elektronischen medien%22 1
rvk_ss%3a%2200 15840 allgemeines %2f medien- und kommunikationswissenschaften%2c kommunikationsdesign %2f firmen der kommunikation und des kommunikationsdesigns %2f kommunikationsdesign in elektronischen medien%22 1
rvk_ss%3a%2200 15860 allgemeinen %2f medien- und kommunikationswissenschaften%2c kommunikationsdesign %2f firmen der kommunikation und des kommunikationsdesigns %2f kommunikationsdesign in elektronischen medien%22 1
rvk_ss%3a%2200 15860 allgemeines %2f medien- und kommunikationswissenschaften%2c kommunikationsdesign %2f firmen der kommunikation und des kommunikationsdesigns %2f kommunikationsdesigns in elektronischen medien%22 1
rvk_ss%3a%2200 15860 allgemeines %2f medien- und kommunikationswissenschaften%2c kommunikationsdesigns %2f firmen der kommunikation und des kommunikationsdesigns %2f kommunikationsdesign in elektronischen medien%22 1

Robertson, M.; Willett, P.: ¬An upperbound to the performance of ranked output searching : optimal weighting of query terms using a genetic algorithms (1996) 0.00

2.4070531E-4 = product of:
  0.004814106 = sum of:
    0.004814106 = weight(_text_:in in 6977) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.004814106 = score(doc=6977,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.04004059 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0294361 = queryNorm
        0.120230645 = fieldWeight in 6977, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6977)
  0.05 = coord(1/20)

Abstract: Describes the development of a genetic algorithm (GA) for the assignment of weights to query terms in a ranked output document retrieval system. The GA involves a fitness function that is based on full relevance information, and the rankings resulting from the use of these weights are compared with the Robertson-Sparck Jones F4 retrospective relevance weight