-
Robertson, S.; Callan, J.: Routing and filtering (2005)
0.01
0.008009522 = product of:
0.05606665 = sum of:
0.014125523 = weight(_text_:information in 4688) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014125523 = score(doc=4688,freq=2.0), product of:
0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.029633347 = queryNorm
0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 4688, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4688)
0.04194113 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4688) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04194113 = score(doc=4688,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.029633347 = queryNorm
0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 4688, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4688)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Source
- TREC: experiment and evaluation in information retrieval. Ed.: E.M. Voorhees, u. D.K. Harman
-
Robertson, S.: How Okapi came to TREC (2005)
0.01
0.006865305 = product of:
0.04805713 = sum of:
0.012107591 = weight(_text_:information in 5087) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012107591 = score(doc=5087,freq=2.0), product of:
0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.029633347 = queryNorm
0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 5087, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5087)
0.03594954 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5087) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03594954 = score(doc=5087,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.029633347 = queryNorm
0.40105087 = fieldWeight in 5087, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5087)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Source
- TREC: experiment and evaluation in information retrieval. Ed.: E.M. Voorhees, u. D.K. Harman
-
Robertson, S.: On the history of evaluation in IR (2009)
0.01
0.006472671 = product of:
0.045308694 = sum of:
0.011415146 = weight(_text_:information in 3653) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011415146 = score(doc=3653,freq=4.0), product of:
0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.029633347 = queryNorm
0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 3653, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3653)
0.033893548 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3653) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033893548 = score(doc=3653,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.029633347 = queryNorm
0.37811437 = fieldWeight in 3653, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3653)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Abstract
- This paper is a personal take on the history of evaluation experiments in information retrieval. It describes some of the early experiments that were formative in our understanding, and goes on to discuss the current dominance of TREC (the Text REtrieval Conference) and to assess its impact.
- Source
- Information science in transition, Ed.: A. Gilchrist
