Robertson, S.E.; Sparck Jones, K.: Relevance weighting of search terms (1976)
0.00
0.004828822 = product of:
0.012072055 = sum of:
0.003715115 = weight(_text_:s in 71) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.003715115 = score(doc=71,freq=2.0), product of:
0.038659193 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.035557263 = queryNorm
0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 71, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=71)
0.00835694 = weight(_text_:a in 71) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00835694 = score(doc=71,freq=8.0), product of:
0.040999193 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.035557263 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 71, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=71)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Examines statistical techniques for exploiting relevance information to weight search terms. These techniques are presented as a natural extension of weighting methods using information about the distribution of index terms in documents in general. A series of relevance weighting functions is derived and is justified by theoretical considerations. In particular, it is shown that specific weighted search methods are implied by a general probabilistic theory of retrieval. Different applications of relevance weighting are illustrated by experimental results for test collections
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 27(1976), S.129-146
- Type
- a
