Robertson, S.E.; Sparck Jones, K.: Relevance weighting of search terms (1976)
0.02
0.020541014 = product of:
0.03081152 = sum of:
0.014795236 = weight(_text_:in in 71) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014795236 = score(doc=71,freq=6.0), product of:
0.07104705 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.052230705 = queryNorm
0.2082456 = fieldWeight in 71, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=71)
0.016016284 = product of:
0.032032568 = sum of:
0.032032568 = weight(_text_:science in 71) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032032568 = score(doc=71,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1375819 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.052230705 = queryNorm
0.23282544 = fieldWeight in 71, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=71)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Examines statistical techniques for exploiting relevance information to weight search terms. These techniques are presented as a natural extension of weighting methods using information about the distribution of index terms in documents in general. A series of relevance weighting functions is derived and is justified by theoretical considerations. In particular, it is shown that specific weighted search methods are implied by a general probabilistic theory of retrieval. Different applications of relevance weighting are illustrated by experimental results for test collections
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 27(1976), S.129-146