Search (6 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Robertson, S.E."
  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × year_i:[1970 TO 1980}
  1. Robertson, S.E.: Theories and models in information retrieval (1977) 0.01
    0.007560872 = product of:
      0.0529261 = sum of:
        0.011415146 = weight(_text_:information in 1844) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011415146 = score(doc=1844,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 1844, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1844)
        0.041510954 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1844) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041510954 = score(doc=1844,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.46309367 = fieldWeight in 1844, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1844)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    This paper is concerned with recent work in the theory of information retrieval. More particularly, it is concerned with theories which tackle the problem of retrieval performance, in a sense which will be explained. The aim is not an exhaustive survey of such work; rather it is an analysis and synthesis of those contributions which I feel to be important or find interesting
  2. Robertson, S.E.; Walker, S.: Some simple effective approximations to the 2-Poisson molde for probabilisitc weighted retrieval (1979) 0.01
    0.0074937996 = product of:
      0.052456595 = sum of:
        0.010089659 = weight(_text_:information in 1940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010089659 = score(doc=1940,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 1940, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1940)
        0.042366937 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042366937 = score(doc=1940,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.47264296 = fieldWeight in 1940, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1940)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Footnote
    Wiederabgedruckt in: Readings in information retrieval. Ed.: K. Sparck Jones u. P. Willett. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann 1997. S.345-453.
  3. Robertson, S.E.: ¬The probability ranking principle in IR (1977) 0.01
    0.006865305 = product of:
      0.04805713 = sum of:
        0.012107591 = weight(_text_:information in 1935) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012107591 = score(doc=1935,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 1935, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1935)
        0.03594954 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1935) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03594954 = score(doc=1935,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.40105087 = fieldWeight in 1935, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1935)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Footnote
    Wiederabgedruckt in: Readings in information retrieval. Ed.: K. Sparck Jones u. P. Willet. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann 1997. S.281-286.
  4. Robertson, S.E.; Sparck Jones, K.: Relevance weighting of search terms (1976) 0.01
    0.0054210005 = product of:
      0.037947003 = sum of:
        0.013980643 = weight(_text_:information in 71) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013980643 = score(doc=71,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.2687516 = fieldWeight in 71, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=71)
        0.023966359 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 71) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023966359 = score(doc=71,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 71, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=71)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    Examines statistical techniques for exploiting relevance information to weight search terms. These techniques are presented as a natural extension of weighting methods using information about the distribution of index terms in documents in general. A series of relevance weighting functions is derived and is justified by theoretical considerations. In particular, it is shown that specific weighted search methods are implied by a general probabilistic theory of retrieval. Different applications of relevance weighting are illustrated by experimental results for test collections
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 27(1976), S.129-146
  5. Robertson, S.E.: Indexing theory and retrieval effectiveness (1979) 0.00
    0.004279707 = product of:
      0.059915897 = sum of:
        0.059915897 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5175) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.059915897 = score(doc=5175,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.6684181 = fieldWeight in 5175, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=5175)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
  6. Robertson, S.E.: ¬The probabilistic character of relevance (1977) 0.00
    0.0011531039 = product of:
      0.016143454 = sum of:
        0.016143454 = weight(_text_:information in 7399) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016143454 = score(doc=7399,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 7399, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7399)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 13(1977), S.247-251