Robertson, S.E.; Sparck Jones, K.: Relevance weighting of search terms (1976)
0.03
0.030564837 = product of:
0.045847256 = sum of:
0.029843956 = weight(_text_:of in 71) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029843956 = score(doc=71,freq=14.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.36569026 = fieldWeight in 71, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=71)
0.0160033 = product of:
0.0320066 = sum of:
0.0320066 = weight(_text_:science in 71) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0320066 = score(doc=71,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.23282544 = fieldWeight in 71, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=71)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Examines statistical techniques for exploiting relevance information to weight search terms. These techniques are presented as a natural extension of weighting methods using information about the distribution of index terms in documents in general. A series of relevance weighting functions is derived and is justified by theoretical considerations. In particular, it is shown that specific weighted search methods are implied by a general probabilistic theory of retrieval. Different applications of relevance weighting are illustrated by experimental results for test collections
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 27(1976), S.129-146