Search (11 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Robertson, S.E."
  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  1. Robertson, S.E.; Beaulieu, M.: Research and evaluation in information retrieval (1997) 0.01 
    0.009153739 = product of:
  0.06407617 = sum of:
    0.016143454 = weight(_text_:information in 7445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016143454 = score(doc=7445,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 7445, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7445)
    0.047932718 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 7445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.047932718 = score(doc=7445,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 7445, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7445)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Abstract
    Offered as a discussion document drawing on the experiences of the Okapi team in developing information retrieval systems. Raises some of the issues currently exercising the information retrieval community in the context of experimentation and evaluation
    Footnote
    Contribution to a thematic issue on Okapi and information retrieval research
  2. MacFarlane, A.; Robertson, S.E.; McCann, J.A.: Parallel computing in information retrieval : an updated review (1997) 0.01 
    0.008844766 = product of:
  0.06191336 = sum of:
    0.013980643 = weight(_text_:information in 7450) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013980643 = score(doc=7450,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.2687516 = fieldWeight in 7450, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7450)
    0.047932718 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 7450) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.047932718 = score(doc=7450,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 7450, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7450)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Abstract
    Reviews the progress of parallel computing in information retrieval. Stresses the importance of the motivation is using parallel computing for text retrieval. Analyzes parallel IR systems using a classification defined by Rasmussen and describes some parallel IR systems. Gives a description of the retrieval models used in parallel information processing and notes areas where research is needed
  3. Robertson, S.E.; Walker, S.; Beaulieu, M.: Laboratory experiments with Okapi : participation in the TREC programme (1997) 0.01 
    0.0074184835 = product of:
  0.05192938 = sum of:
    0.009988253 = weight(_text_:information in 2216) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009988253 = score(doc=2216,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 2216, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2216)
    0.04194113 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2216) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04194113 = score(doc=2216,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 2216, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2216)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Abstract
    Briefly reviews the history of laboratory testing of information retrieval systems, focusing on the idea of a general purpose test collection of documents, queries and relevance judgements. Gives an overview of the methods used in TREC (Text Retrieval Conference) which is concerned with an ideal test collection, and discusses the Okapi team's participation in TREC. Also discusses some of the issues surrounding the difficult problem of interactive evaluation in TREC. The reconciliation of the requirements of the laboratory context with the concerns of interactive retrieval has a long way to go
    Footnote
    Contribution to a thematic issue on Okapi and information retrieval research
  4. Robertson, S.E.: Overview of the Okapi projects (1997) 0.01 
    0.00683917 = product of:
  0.04787419 = sum of:
    0.013980643 = weight(_text_:information in 4703) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013980643 = score(doc=4703,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.2687516 = fieldWeight in 4703, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4703)
    0.033893548 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4703) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.033893548 = score(doc=4703,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.37811437 = fieldWeight in 4703, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4703)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Abstract
    Gives a brief description of the Okapi projects and of the work of the centre for Interactive Systems Research in the Department of Information Science at City University, London,UK, where these projects have been developed. Describes firstly one version of an information retrieval system which contains some of the central features of the Okapi projects, and follows this with an indication of the variety of systems now implemented or implementable within the present setup
    Footnote
    Contribution to a thematic issue on Okapi and information retrieval research
  5. Huang, X.; Robertson, S.E.: Application of probilistic methods to Chinese text retrieval (1997) 0.01 
    0.0061978353 = product of:
  0.043384846 = sum of:
    0.0070627616 = weight(_text_:information in 4706) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0070627616 = score(doc=4706,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 4706, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4706)
    0.036322083 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4706) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.036322083 = score(doc=4706,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.40520695 = fieldWeight in 4706, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4706)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Abstract
    Discusses the use of text retrieval methods based on the probabilistic model with Chinese language material. Since Chinese text has no natural word boundaries, either a dictionary based word segmentation method must be applied to the text, or indexing and searching must be done in terms of single Chinese characters. In either case, it becomes important to have a good way of dealing with phrases or contoguous strings of characters; the probabilistic model does not at present have such a facility. Proposes some ad hoc modifications of the probabilistic weighting function and matching method for this purpose
    Footnote
    Contribution to a thematic issue on Okapi and information retrieval research
  6. Robertson, S.E.: Query-document symmetry and dual models (1994) 0.00 
    0.0045768693 = product of:
  0.032038085 = sum of:
    0.008071727 = weight(_text_:information in 8159) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008071727 = score(doc=8159,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 8159, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8159)
    0.023966359 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 8159) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.023966359 = score(doc=8159,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 8159, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8159)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Abstract
    The idea that there is some natural symmetry between queries and documents is explained. If symmetry can be assumed, then it lead to a conception of 'dual' models in information retrieval (given a model, we can construct a dual model in which the roles of documents and queries are reversed). But symmetry breaks down in various ways, which may invalidate this construction. If we can construct a dual, it is not obvious that it can be combined with the original
  7. Robertson, S.E.; Walker, S.; Hancock-Beaulieu, M.M.: Large test collection experiments of an operational, interactive system : OKAPI at TREC (1995) 0.00 
    0.004004761 = product of:
  0.028033325 = sum of:
    0.0070627616 = weight(_text_:information in 6964) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0070627616 = score(doc=6964,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 6964, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6964)
    0.020970564 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 6964) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.020970564 = score(doc=6964,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 6964, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6964)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Source
    Information processing and management. 31(1995) no.3, S.345-360
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
  8. Robertson, S.E.; Walker, S.; Beaulieu, M.M.; Gatford, M.; Payne, A.: Okapi at TREC-4 (1996) 0.00 
    0.0025678244 = product of:
  0.03594954 = sum of:
    0.03594954 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 7546) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03594954 = score(doc=7546,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.40105087 = fieldWeight in 7546, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7546)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    Source
    The Fourth Text Retrieval Conference (TREC-4). Ed.: K. Harman
  9. Beaulieu, M.M.; Gatford, M.; Huang, X.; Robertson, S.E.; Walker, S.; Williams, P.: Okapi an TREC-5 (1997) 0.00 
    0.0025678244 = product of:
  0.03594954 = sum of:
    0.03594954 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3097) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03594954 = score(doc=3097,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.40105087 = fieldWeight in 3097, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3097)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    Source
    The Fifth Text Retrieval Conference (TREC-5). Ed.: E.M. Voorhees u. D.K. Harman
  10. Robertson, S.E.: On term selection for query expansion (1990) 0.00 
    0.002420968 = product of:
  0.033893548 = sum of:
    0.033893548 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.033893548 = score(doc=2650,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.37811437 = fieldWeight in 2650, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2650)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    Abstract
    In the framework of a relevance feedback system, term values or term weights may be used to (a) select new terms for inclusion in a query, and/or (b) weight the terms for retrieval purposes once selected. It has sometimes been assumed that the same weighting formula should be used for both purposes. This paper sketches a quantitative argument which suggests that the two purposes require different weighting formulae
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
  11. Robertson, S.E.; Hancock-Beaulieu, M.M.: On the evaluation of IR systems (1992) 0.00 
    0.0011531039 = product of:
  0.016143454 = sum of:
    0.016143454 = weight(_text_:information in 2619) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016143454 = score(doc=2619,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 2619, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2619)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    Source
    Information processing and management. 28(1992) no.4, S.457-466

Authors

Themes