Search (38 results, page 2 of 2)

  • × author_ss:"Robertson, S.E."
  1. Robertson, S.E.: OKAPI at TREC-3 (1995) 0.02
    0.017819514 = product of:
      0.07127806 = sum of:
        0.050615493 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5694) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.050615493 = score(doc=5694,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.40520695 = fieldWeight in 5694, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5694)
        0.020662563 = weight(_text_:of in 5694) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020662563 = score(doc=5694,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.31997898 = fieldWeight in 5694, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5694)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Abstract
    Reports text information retrieval experiments performed as part of the 3 rd round of Text Retrieval Conferences (TREC) using the Okapi online catalogue system at City University, UK. The emphasis in TREC-3 was: further refinement of term weighting functions; an investigation of run time passage determination and searching; expansion of ad hoc queries by terms extracted from the top documents retrieved by a trial search; new methods for choosing query expansion terms after relevance feedback, now split into methods of ranking terms prior to selection and subsequent selection procedures; and the development of a user interface procedure within the new TREC interactive search framework
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
  2. Robertson, S.E.; Walker, S.: Some simple effective approximations to the 2-Poisson molde for probabilisitc weighted retrieval (1979) 0.02
    0.01754896 = product of:
      0.07019584 = sum of:
        0.059039105 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.059039105 = score(doc=1940,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.47264296 = fieldWeight in 1940, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1940)
        0.011156735 = weight(_text_:of in 1940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011156735 = score(doc=1940,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.17277241 = fieldWeight in 1940, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1940)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Footnote
    Wiederabgedruckt in: Readings in information retrieval. Ed.: K. Sparck Jones u. P. Willett. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann 1997. S.345-453.
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 35(1979), S.285-295 (???)
  3. Sparck Jones, K.; Walker, S.; Robertson, S.E.: ¬A probabilistic model of information retrieval : development and comparative experiments - part 1 (2000) 0.02
    0.015871106 = product of:
      0.06348442 = sum of:
        0.050096344 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.050096344 = score(doc=4181,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.40105087 = fieldWeight in 4181, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4181)
        0.013388081 = weight(_text_:of in 4181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013388081 = score(doc=4181,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.20732689 = fieldWeight in 4181, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4181)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
  4. Sparck Jones, K.; Walker, S.; Robertson, S.E.: ¬A probabilistic model of information retrieval : development and comparative experiments - part 2 (2000) 0.02
    0.015871106 = product of:
      0.06348442 = sum of:
        0.050096344 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4286) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.050096344 = score(doc=4286,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.40105087 = fieldWeight in 4286, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4286)
        0.013388081 = weight(_text_:of in 4286) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013388081 = score(doc=4286,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.20732689 = fieldWeight in 4286, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4286)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
  5. Robertson, S.E.; Walker, S.; Beaulieu, M.M.; Gatford, M.; Payne, A.: Okapi at TREC-4 (1996) 0.02
    0.015871106 = product of:
      0.06348442 = sum of:
        0.050096344 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 7546) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.050096344 = score(doc=7546,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.40105087 = fieldWeight in 7546, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7546)
        0.013388081 = weight(_text_:of in 7546) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013388081 = score(doc=7546,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.20732689 = fieldWeight in 7546, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7546)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Imprint
    Gaithersburgh, MD : National Institute of Standards and Technology
    Source
    The Fourth Text Retrieval Conference (TREC-4). Ed.: K. Harman
  6. Robertson, S.E.: ¬The probability ranking principle in IR (1977) 0.02
    0.015871106 = product of:
      0.06348442 = sum of:
        0.050096344 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1935) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.050096344 = score(doc=1935,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.40105087 = fieldWeight in 1935, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1935)
        0.013388081 = weight(_text_:of in 1935) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013388081 = score(doc=1935,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.20732689 = fieldWeight in 1935, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1935)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Footnote
    Wiederabgedruckt in: Readings in information retrieval. Ed.: K. Sparck Jones u. P. Willet. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann 1997. S.281-286.
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 33(1977), S.294-304
  7. Beaulieu, M.M.; Gatford, M.; Huang, X.; Robertson, S.E.; Walker, S.; Williams, P.: Okapi an TREC-5 (1997) 0.02
    0.015871106 = product of:
      0.06348442 = sum of:
        0.050096344 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3097) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.050096344 = score(doc=3097,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.40105087 = fieldWeight in 3097, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3097)
        0.013388081 = weight(_text_:of in 3097) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013388081 = score(doc=3097,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.20732689 = fieldWeight in 3097, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3097)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Imprint
    Gaithersburgh, MD : National Institute of Standards and Technology
    Source
    The Fifth Text Retrieval Conference (TREC-5). Ed.: E.M. Voorhees u. D.K. Harman
  8. Robertson, S.E.: ¬The parametric description of retrieval tests : Part II: Overall measures (1969) 0.02
    0.015854144 = product of:
      0.06341658 = sum of:
        0.041327372 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041327372 = score(doc=4156,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 4156, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4156)
        0.022089208 = weight(_text_:of in 4156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022089208 = score(doc=4156,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.34207192 = fieldWeight in 4156, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4156)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Abstract
    Two general requirements for overall measures of retrieval effectiveness are proposed, namely that the measures should be as far as possible independent of generality (this is interpreted to mean that it can be described in terms of recall and fallout), and that it should be able to measure the effectiveness of a performance curve (it should not be restricted to a simple 2X2 table). Several measures that have been proposed are examined with these conditions in mind. It turns out that most of the satisfactory ones are directly or indirectly related to swet's measure A, the area under the recall-fallout curve. In particular, Brookes' measure S and Rocchio's normalized recall are versions of A.
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 25(1969) no.2, S.93-106
  9. Robertson, S.E.; Sparck Jones, K.: Relevance weighting of search terms (1976) 0.01
    0.014252979 = product of:
      0.057011917 = sum of:
        0.033397563 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 71) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033397563 = score(doc=71,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 71, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=71)
        0.023614356 = weight(_text_:of in 71) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023614356 = score(doc=71,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.36569026 = fieldWeight in 71, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=71)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Abstract
    Examines statistical techniques for exploiting relevance information to weight search terms. These techniques are presented as a natural extension of weighting methods using information about the distribution of index terms in documents in general. A series of relevance weighting functions is derived and is justified by theoretical considerations. In particular, it is shown that specific weighted search methods are implied by a general probabilistic theory of retrieval. Different applications of relevance weighting are illustrated by experimental results for test collections
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 27(1976), S.129-146
  10. Robertson, S.E.: Query-document symmetry and dual models (1994) 0.01
    0.012214197 = product of:
      0.048856787 = sum of:
        0.033397563 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 8159) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033397563 = score(doc=8159,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 8159, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8159)
        0.0154592255 = weight(_text_:of in 8159) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0154592255 = score(doc=8159,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.23940048 = fieldWeight in 8159, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8159)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Abstract
    The idea that there is some natural symmetry between queries and documents is explained. If symmetry can be assumed, then it lead to a conception of 'dual' models in information retrieval (given a model, we can construct a dual model in which the roles of documents and queries are reversed). But symmetry breaks down in various ways, which may invalidate this construction. If we can construct a dual, it is not obvious that it can be combined with the original
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 50(1994) no.3, S.233-238
  11. Robertson, S.E.: Indexing theory and retrieval effectiveness (1979) 0.01
    0.010436738 = product of:
      0.0834939 = sum of:
        0.0834939 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5175) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0834939 = score(doc=5175,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.6684181 = fieldWeight in 5175, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=5175)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
  12. Robertson, S.E.; Hancock-Beaulieu, M.M.: On the evaluation of IR systems (1992) 0.01
    0.0088768 = product of:
      0.0355072 = sum of:
        0.017850775 = weight(_text_:of in 2619) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017850775 = score(doc=2619,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 2619, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2619)
        0.017656423 = product of:
          0.035312846 = sum of:
            0.035312846 = weight(_text_:on in 2619) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035312846 = score(doc=2619,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.3888053 = fieldWeight in 2619, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2619)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
  13. Hancock-Beaulieu, M.; Robertson, S.E.; Neilson, C.: Evaluation of online catalogues : an assessment of methods (1990) 0.00
    0.002761151 = product of:
      0.022089208 = sum of:
        0.022089208 = weight(_text_:of in 5262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022089208 = score(doc=5262,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.34207192 = fieldWeight in 5262, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5262)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
  14. Robertson, S.E.; Belkin, N.J.: Ranking in principle (1978) 0.00
    0.002231347 = product of:
      0.017850775 = sum of:
        0.017850775 = weight(_text_:of in 1143) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017850775 = score(doc=1143,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 1143, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1143)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 34(1978), S.93-100
  15. Robertson, S.E.: ¬The probabilistic character of relevance (1977) 0.00
    0.002231347 = product of:
      0.017850775 = sum of:
        0.017850775 = weight(_text_:of in 7399) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017850775 = score(doc=7399,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 7399, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7399)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
  16. Robertson, S.E.; Thompson, C.L.: ¬An operational evaluation of weighting, ranking and relevance feedback via a front-end system (1987) 0.00
    0.0019524286 = product of:
      0.015619429 = sum of:
        0.015619429 = weight(_text_:of in 3858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015619429 = score(doc=3858,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.24188137 = fieldWeight in 3858, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3858)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
  17. Bovey, J.D.; Robertson, S.E.: ¬An algorithm for weighted searching on a Boolean system (1984) 0.00
    0.0019311713 = product of:
      0.01544937 = sum of:
        0.01544937 = product of:
          0.03089874 = sum of:
            0.03089874 = weight(_text_:on in 788) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03089874 = score(doc=788,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.34020463 = fieldWeight in 788, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=788)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
  18. Robertson, S.E.; Walker, S.; Beaulieu, M.: Experimentation as a way of life : Okapi at TREC (2000) 0.00
    0.0016735102 = product of:
      0.013388081 = sum of:
        0.013388081 = weight(_text_:of in 6030) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013388081 = score(doc=6030,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.20732689 = fieldWeight in 6030, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6030)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)