Search (25 results, page 2 of 2)

  • × author_ss:"Robinson, L."
  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Price, L.; Robinson, L.: Tag analysis as a tool for investigating information behaviour : comparing fan-tagging on Tumblr, Archive of Our Own and Etsy (2021) 0.00
    7.0612907E-4 = product of:
      0.009885807 = sum of:
        0.009885807 = weight(_text_:information in 339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009885807 = score(doc=339,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.19003606 = fieldWeight in 339, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=339)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose This article describes the third part of a three-stage study investigating the information behaviour of fans and fan communities, the first stage of which is described in the study by Price and Robinson (2017). Design/methodology/approach Using tag analysis as a method, a comparative case study was undertaken to explore three aspects of fan information behaviour: information gatekeeping; classifying and tagging and entrepreneurship and economic activity. The case studies took place on three sites used by fans-Tumblr, Archive of Our Own (AO3) and Etsy. Supplementary semi-structured interviews with site users were used to augment the findings with qualitative data. Findings These showed that fans used tags in a variety of ways quite apart from classification purposes. These included tags being used on Tumblr as meta-commentary and a means of dialogue between users, as well as expressors of emotion and affect towards posts. On AO3 in particular, fans had developed a practice called "tag wrangling" to mitigate the inherent "messiness" of tagging. Evidence was also found of a "hybrid market economy" on Etsy fan stores. From the study findings, a taxonomy of fan-related tags was developed. Research limitations/implications Findings are limited to the tagging practices on only three sites used by fans during Spring 2016, and further research on other similar sites are recommended. Longitudinal studies of these sites would be beneficial in understanding how or whether tagging practices change over time. Testing of the fan-tag taxonomy developed in this paper is also recommended. Originality/value This research develops a method for using tag analysis to describe information behaviour. It also develops a fan-tag taxonomy, which may be used in future research on the tagging practices of fans, which heretofore have been a little-studied section of serious leisure information users.
  2. Mayor, C.; Robinson, L.: Ontological realism and classification : structures and concepts in the Gene Ontology (2014) 0.00
    5.7655195E-4 = product of:
      0.008071727 = sum of:
        0.008071727 = weight(_text_:information in 1231) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008071727 = score(doc=1231,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 1231, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1231)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.4, S.686-697
  3. Lee, D.; Robinson, L.; Bawden, D.: Global knowledge organization, "super-facets" and music : universal music classification in the digital age (2018) 0.00
    5.7655195E-4 = product of:
      0.008071727 = sum of:
        0.008071727 = weight(_text_:information in 4746) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008071727 = score(doc=4746,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 4746, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4746)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Source
    Challenges and opportunities for knowledge organization in the digital age: proceedings of the Fifteenth International ISKO Conference, 9-11 July 2018, Porto, Portugal / organized by: International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO Spain and Portugal Chapter, University of Porto - Faculty of Arts and Humanities, Research Centre in Communication, Information and Digital Culture (CIC.digital) - Porto. Eds.: F. Ribeiro u. M.E. Cerveira
  4. Lee, D.; Robinson, L.; Bawden, D.: Modeling the relationship between scientific and bibliographic classification for music (2019) 0.00
    3.6034497E-4 = product of:
      0.0050448296 = sum of:
        0.0050448296 = weight(_text_:information in 4988) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0050448296 = score(doc=4988,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 4988, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4988)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 70(2019) no.3, S.230-241
  5. Lee, D.; Robinson, L.; Bawden, D.: Orthogonality, dependency, and music : an exploration of the relationships between music facets (2021) 0.00
    3.6034497E-4 = product of:
      0.0050448296 = sum of:
        0.0050448296 = weight(_text_:information in 212) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0050448296 = score(doc=212,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 212, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=212)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 72(2021) no.5, S.570-582