Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Romero, L."
  • × theme_ss:"Formalerschließung"
  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  1. Romero, L.: Original cataloguing errors : a comparison of errors found in entry-level cataloging with errors found in OCLC and RLIN (1994) 0.03
    0.03324759 = product of:
      0.26598072 = sum of:
        0.13299036 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 2333) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13299036 = score(doc=2333,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.9320739 = fieldWeight in 2333, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2333)
        0.13299036 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 2333) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13299036 = score(doc=2333,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.9320739 = fieldWeight in 2333, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2333)
      0.125 = coord(2/16)
    
    Abstract
    Statistically examines the data in 2 studies of cataloguing errors: the 1st concerning original cataloguing errors produced by entry-level cataloguers, and the second concerning cataloguing errors in the OCLC and RLIN database. The numer and percentage of errors were analyzed to determine whether or not certain 'areas of cataloguing difficulty' exist in monographic cataloguing. In some areas of the catalogue record, namely, description and headings, title ad statement or responsibility, and notes, no significant difference was found in the entry-level cataloguing and non-entry-level cataloguing. This suggests that there are areas within a catalogue record that cause difficulty simply because of their nature and are not unique to any particular group of cataloguing personnel. The implications of this finding for cataloguing instructors and administrators are discussed
  2. Romero, L.: ¬An analysis of entry-level cataloging errors (1994) 0.03
    0.02803683 = product of:
      0.22429463 = sum of:
        0.11214732 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 6874) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11214732 = score(doc=6874,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.7859937 = fieldWeight in 6874, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6874)
        0.11214732 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 6874) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11214732 = score(doc=6874,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.7859937 = fieldWeight in 6874, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6874)
      0.125 = coord(2/16)
    
    Abstract
    Presents results of a study, conducted over a 4 month period and involving graduate students at illinois University at Urbana-Champaign who had completed a course on monograph cataloguing, to determine the types of errors that appear on original cataloguing copy by entry level cataloguers. Records were analyzed for errors in description, headings, encoding of MARC format, capitalization, punctuation, and any other errors affecting access. Results should assist educators in planning and implementing cataloguing courses and will inform professionals hiring cataloguers out of library school on how well the graduates are prepared for professional cataloguing
  3. Romero, L.: ¬The cataloging laboratory : the active learning theory applied to the education of catalogers (1995) 0.02
    0.019825032 = product of:
      0.15860026 = sum of:
        0.07930013 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 4827) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07930013 = score(doc=4827,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.5557815 = fieldWeight in 4827, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4827)
        0.07930013 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 4827) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07930013 = score(doc=4827,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.5557815 = fieldWeight in 4827, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4827)
      0.125 = coord(2/16)
    
    Abstract
    The active learning theory provides a balance between theory and practice and requires that students be inquirers, creators and receivers of knowledge. Within library education, cataloguing, where knowledge is based around techniques and skills, would benefit greatly from the active learning concept. Shows how a laboratory environment based on the active learning theory, can be successful in teaching cataloguing and thereby better prepare students to enter the work environment
  4. Romero, L.; Romero, N.: Cataloging early atlases : a reference source (1999) 0.00
    0.001934564 = product of:
      0.030953024 = sum of:
        0.030953024 = weight(_text_:26 in 5329) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030953024 = score(doc=5329,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.113328174 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.27312735 = fieldWeight in 5329, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5329)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Date
    26. 7.2006 12:06:03