Search (6 results, page 1 of 1)

Rousseau, R.; Zuccala, A.: ¬A classification of author co-citations : definitions and search strategies (2004) 0.01
```
0.012874799 = product of:
  0.025749598 = sum of:
    0.025749598 = product of:
      0.15449758 = sum of:
        0.15449758 = weight(_text_:author's in 2266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15449758 = score(doc=2266,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.2942744 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043789834 = queryNorm
            0.52501196 = fieldWeight in 2266, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2266)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
```
Abstract

The term author co-citation is defined and classified according to four distinct forms: the pure first-author co-citation, the pure author co-citation, the general author co-citation, and the special co-authorlco-citation. Each form can be used to obtain one count in an author co-citation study, based an a binary counting rule, which either recognizes the co-citedness of two authors in a given reference list (1) or does not (0). Most studies using author co-citations have relied solely an first-author cocitation counts as evidence of an author's oeuvre or body of work contributed to a research field. In this article, we argue that an author's contribution to a selected field of study should not be limited, but should be based an his/her complete list of publications, regardless of author ranking. We discuss the implications associated with using each co-citation form and show where simple first-author co-citations fit within our classification scheme. Examples are given to substantiate each author co-citation form defined in our classification, including a set of sample Dialog(TM) searches using references extracted from the SciSearch database.
Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: ¬The Hirsch index of a shifted Lotka function and its relation with the impact factor (2012) 0.01
```
0.010074065 = product of:
  0.02014813 = sum of:
    0.02014813 = product of:
      0.04029626 = sum of:
        0.04029626 = weight(_text_:c in 243) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04029626 = score(doc=243,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15104888 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043789834 = queryNorm
            0.2667763 = fieldWeight in 243, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=243)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
```
Abstract

Based on earlier results about the shifted Lotka function, we prove an implicit functional relation between the Hirsch index (h-index) and the total number of sources (T). It is shown that the corresponding function, h(T), is concavely increasing. Next, we construct an implicit relation between the h-index and the impact factor IF (an average number of items per source). The corresponding function h(IF) is increasing and we show that if the parameter C in the numerator of the shifted Lotka function is high, then the relation between the h-index and the impact factor is almost linear.

Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: Averaging and globalising quotients of informetric and scientometric data (1996) 0.01

0.008899377 = product of:
  0.017798753 = sum of:
    0.017798753 = product of:
      0.035597507 = sum of:
        0.035597507 = weight(_text_:22 in 7659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035597507 = score(doc=7659,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15334454 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043789834 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 7659, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7659)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source: Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.3, S.165-170

Asonuma, A.; Fang, Y.; Rousseau, R.: Reflections on the age distribution of Japanese scientists (2006) 0.01

0.008899377 = product of:
  0.017798753 = sum of:
    0.017798753 = product of:
      0.035597507 = sum of:
        0.035597507 = weight(_text_:22 in 5270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035597507 = score(doc=5270,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15334454 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043789834 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5270, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5270)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date: 22. 7.2006 15:26:24

Colebunders, R.; Kenyon, C.; Rousseau, R.: Increase in numbers and proportions of review articles in Tropical Medicine, Infectious Diseases, and oncology (2014) 0.01

0.008634914 = product of:
  0.017269827 = sum of:
    0.017269827 = product of:
      0.034539655 = sum of:
        0.034539655 = weight(_text_:c in 1189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034539655 = score(doc=1189,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15104888 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043789834 = queryNorm
            0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 1189, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1189)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Ahlgren, P.; Jarneving, B.; Rousseau, R.: Requirements for a cocitation similarity measure, with special reference to Pearson's correlation coefficient (2003) 0.01

0.0059329183 = product of:
  0.011865837 = sum of:
    0.011865837 = product of:
      0.023731673 = sum of:
        0.023731673 = weight(_text_:22 in 5171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023731673 = score(doc=5171,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15334454 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043789834 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5171, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5171)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date: 9. 7.2006 10:22:35

Search (6 results, page 1 of 1)

Authors

Years