Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

Rousseau, R.; Zuccala, A.: ¬A classification of author co-citations : definitions and search strategies (2004) 0.02
```
0.022219414 = product of:
  0.044438828 = sum of:
    0.044438828 = product of:
      0.17775531 = sum of:
        0.17775531 = weight(_text_:author's in 2266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17775531 = score(doc=2266,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.33857384 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05038186 = queryNorm
            0.52501196 = fieldWeight in 2266, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2266)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
```
Abstract

The term author co-citation is defined and classified according to four distinct forms: the pure first-author co-citation, the pure author co-citation, the general author co-citation, and the special co-authorlco-citation. Each form can be used to obtain one count in an author co-citation study, based an a binary counting rule, which either recognizes the co-citedness of two authors in a given reference list (1) or does not (0). Most studies using author co-citations have relied solely an first-author cocitation counts as evidence of an author's oeuvre or body of work contributed to a research field. In this article, we argue that an author's contribution to a selected field of study should not be limited, but should be based an his/her complete list of publications, regardless of author ranking. We discuss the implications associated with using each co-citation form and show where simple first-author co-citations fit within our classification scheme. Examples are given to substantiate each author co-citation form defined in our classification, including a set of sample Dialog(TM) searches using references extracted from the SciSearch database.
Jin, B.; Li, L.; Rousseau, R.: Long-term influences of interventions in the normal development of science : China and the cultural revolution (2004) 0.01
```
0.012957838 = product of:
  0.025915677 = sum of:
    0.025915677 = product of:
      0.051831353 = sum of:
        0.051831353 = weight(_text_:t in 2232) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.051831353 = score(doc=2232,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19847474 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05038186 = queryNorm
            0.26114836 = fieldWeight in 2232, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2232)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
```
Abstract

Intellectual and technological talents and skills are the driving force for scientific and industrial development, especially in our times characterized by a knowledgebased economy. Major events in society and related political decisions, however, can have a long-term effect an a country's scientific weIl-being. Although the Cultural Revolution took place from 1966 to 1976, its aftermath can still be felt. This is shown by this study of the production and productivity of Chinese scientists as a function of their age. Based an the 1995-2000 data from the Chinese Science Citation database (CSCD), this article investigates the year-by-year age distribution of scientific and technological personnel publishing in China. It is shown that the "Talent Fault" originating during the Cultural Revolution still exists, and that a new gap resulting from recent brain drain might be developing. The purpose of this work is to provide necessary information about the current situation and especially the existing problems of the S&T workforce in China.

Asonuma, A.; Fang, Y.; Rousseau, R.: Reflections on the age distribution of Japanese scientists (2006) 0.01

0.010239069 = product of:
  0.020478139 = sum of:
    0.020478139 = product of:
      0.040956277 = sum of:
        0.040956277 = weight(_text_:22 in 5270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040956277 = score(doc=5270,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17642869 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05038186 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5270, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5270)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date: 22. 7.2006 15:26:24

Ahlgren, P.; Jarneving, B.; Rousseau, R.: Requirements for a cocitation similarity measure, with special reference to Pearson's correlation coefficient (2003) 0.01

0.0068260464 = product of:
  0.013652093 = sum of:
    0.013652093 = product of:
      0.027304186 = sum of:
        0.027304186 = weight(_text_:22 in 5171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027304186 = score(doc=5171,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17642869 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05038186 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5171, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5171)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date: 9. 7.2006 10:22:35

Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

Authors

Themes