Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)
-
Ahlgren, P.; Jarneving, B.; Rousseau, R.: Requirements for a cocitation similarity measure, with special reference to Pearson's correlation coefficient (2003)
0.03
0.027731385 = product of: 0.05546277 = sum of: 0.05546277 = sum of: 0.028055204 = weight(_text_:b in 5171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of: 0.028055204 = score(doc=5171,freq=2.0), product of: 0.17917687 = queryWeight, product of: 3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218) 0.05057262 = queryNorm 0.15657827 = fieldWeight in 5171, product of: 1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of: 2.0 = termFreq=2.0 3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218) 0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5171) 0.027407566 = weight(_text_:22 in 5171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of: 0.027407566 = score(doc=5171,freq=2.0), product of: 0.1770967 = queryWeight, product of: 3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218) 0.05057262 = queryNorm 0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5171, product of: 1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of: 2.0 = termFreq=2.0 3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218) 0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5171) 0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 9. 7.2006 10:22:35
-
Rousseau, R.; Zuccala, A.: ¬A classification of author co-citations : definitions and search strategies (2004)
0.02
0.022303542 = product of: 0.044607084 = sum of: 0.044607084 = product of: 0.17842834 = sum of: 0.17842834 = weight(_text_:author's in 2266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of: 0.17842834 = score(doc=2266,freq=4.0), product of: 0.33985576 = queryWeight, product of: 6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218) 0.05057262 = queryNorm 0.52501196 = fieldWeight in 2266, product of: 2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of: 4.0 = termFreq=4.0 6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218) 0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2266) 0.25 = coord(1/4) 0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The term author co-citation is defined and classified according to four distinct forms: the pure first-author co-citation, the pure author co-citation, the general author co-citation, and the special co-authorlco-citation. Each form can be used to obtain one count in an author co-citation study, based an a binary counting rule, which either recognizes the co-citedness of two authors in a given reference list (1) or does not (0). Most studies using author co-citations have relied solely an first-author cocitation counts as evidence of an author's oeuvre or body of work contributed to a research field. In this article, we argue that an author's contribution to a selected field of study should not be limited, but should be based an his/her complete list of publications, regardless of author ranking. We discuss the implications associated with using each co-citation form and show where simple first-author co-citations fit within our classification scheme. Examples are given to substantiate each author co-citation form defined in our classification, including a set of sample Dialog(TM) searches using references extracted from the SciSearch database.