Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Rousseau, R."
  • × theme_ss:"Citation indexing"
  1. Rousseau, R.; Zuccala, A.: ¬A classification of author co-citations : definitions and search strategies (2004) 0.03 
    0.027464014 = product of:
  0.04119602 = sum of:
    0.03835632 = product of:
      0.15342528 = sum of:
        0.15342528 = weight(_text_:author's in 2266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15342528 = score(doc=2266,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.29223198 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04348591 = queryNorm
            0.52501196 = fieldWeight in 2266, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2266)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    0.0028397 = weight(_text_:s in 2266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0028397 = score(doc=2266,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.047279514 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04348591 = queryNorm
        0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 2266, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2266)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    The term author co-citation is defined and classified according to four distinct forms: the pure first-author co-citation, the pure author co-citation, the general author co-citation, and the special co-authorlco-citation. Each form can be used to obtain one count in an author co-citation study, based an a binary counting rule, which either recognizes the co-citedness of two authors in a given reference list (1) or does not (0). Most studies using author co-citations have relied solely an first-author cocitation counts as evidence of an author's oeuvre or body of work contributed to a research field. In this article, we argue that an author's contribution to a selected field of study should not be limited, but should be based an his/her complete list of publications, regardless of author ranking. We discuss the implications associated with using each co-citation form and show where simple first-author co-citations fit within our classification scheme. Examples are given to substantiate each author co-citation form defined in our classification, including a set of sample Dialog(TM) searches using references extracted from the SciSearch database.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 55(2004) no.6, S.513-529
  2. Rousseau, R.: Timelines in citation research (2006) 0.01 
    0.013598297 = product of:
  0.020397445 = sum of:
    0.00454352 = weight(_text_:s in 1746) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.00454352 = score(doc=1746,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.047279514 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04348591 = queryNorm
        0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 1746, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1746)
    0.015853925 = product of:
      0.047561772 = sum of:
        0.047561772 = weight(_text_:29 in 1746) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047561772 = score(doc=1746,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15296984 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04348591 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 1746, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1746)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Date
    18. 8.2006 14:29:40
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.10, S.1404-1405
  3. Frandsen, T.F.; Rousseau, R.: Article impact calculated over arbitrary periods (2005) 0.01 
    0.0101987235 = product of:
  0.015298084 = sum of:
    0.0034076401 = weight(_text_:s in 3264) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0034076401 = score(doc=3264,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.047279514 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04348591 = queryNorm
        0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 3264, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3264)
    0.011890444 = product of:
      0.03567133 = sum of:
        0.03567133 = weight(_text_:29 in 3264) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03567133 = score(doc=3264,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15296984 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04348591 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 3264, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3264)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Date
    20. 3.2005 10:29:08
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 56(2005) no.1, S.58-62
  4. Ahlgren, P.; Jarneving, B.; Rousseau, R.: Requirements for a cocitation similarity measure, with special reference to Pearson's correlation coefficient (2003) 0.01 
    0.0067516095 = product of:
  0.010127414 = sum of:
    0.00227176 = weight(_text_:s in 5171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.00227176 = score(doc=5171,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.047279514 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04348591 = queryNorm
        0.048049565 = fieldWeight in 5171, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5171)
    0.007855654 = product of:
      0.023566961 = sum of:
        0.023566961 = weight(_text_:22 in 5171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023566961 = score(doc=5171,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15228024 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04348591 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5171, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5171)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Date
    9. 7.2006 10:22:35
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 54(2003) no.6, S.549-568
  5. Hu, X.; Rousseau, R.: Do citation chimeras exist? : The case of under-cited influential articles suffering delayed recognition (2019) 0.00 
    0.0011358801 = product of:
  0.0034076401 = sum of:
    0.0034076401 = weight(_text_:s in 5217) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0034076401 = score(doc=5217,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.047279514 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04348591 = queryNorm
        0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 5217, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5217)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 70(2019) no.5, S.499-508

Authors

Years