-
Rousseau, R.; Zuccala, A.: ¬A classification of author co-citations : definitions and search strategies (2004)
0.05
0.046945978 = sum of:
0.045270193 = product of:
0.18108077 = sum of:
0.18108077 = weight(_text_:author's in 2266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18108077 = score(doc=2266,freq=4.0), product of:
0.3449079 = queryWeight, product of:
6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
0.05132441 = queryNorm
0.52501196 = fieldWeight in 2266, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2266)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.0016757835 = product of:
0.003351567 = sum of:
0.003351567 = weight(_text_:s in 2266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.003351567 = score(doc=2266,freq=2.0), product of:
0.055801827 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.05132441 = queryNorm
0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 2266, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2266)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The term author co-citation is defined and classified according to four distinct forms: the pure first-author co-citation, the pure author co-citation, the general author co-citation, and the special co-authorlco-citation. Each form can be used to obtain one count in an author co-citation study, based an a binary counting rule, which either recognizes the co-citedness of two authors in a given reference list (1) or does not (0). Most studies using author co-citations have relied solely an first-author cocitation counts as evidence of an author's oeuvre or body of work contributed to a research field. In this article, we argue that an author's contribution to a selected field of study should not be limited, but should be based an his/her complete list of publications, regardless of author ranking. We discuss the implications associated with using each co-citation form and show where simple first-author co-citations fit within our classification scheme. Examples are given to substantiate each author co-citation form defined in our classification, including a set of sample Dialog(TM) searches using references extracted from the SciSearch database.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 55(2004) no.6, S.513-529
-
Ahlgren, P.; Jarneving, B.; Rousseau, R.: Requirements for a cocitation similarity measure, with special reference to Pearson's correlation coefficient (2003)
0.02
0.015248124 = product of:
0.030496247 = sum of:
0.030496247 = sum of:
0.0026812535 = weight(_text_:s in 5171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0026812535 = score(doc=5171,freq=2.0), product of:
0.055801827 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.05132441 = queryNorm
0.048049565 = fieldWeight in 5171, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5171)
0.027814994 = weight(_text_:22 in 5171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027814994 = score(doc=5171,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17972933 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05132441 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5171, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5171)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 9. 7.2006 10:22:35
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 54(2003) no.6, S.549-568
-
Rousseau, R.: Timelines in citation research (2006)
0.00
0.0013406267 = product of:
0.0026812535 = sum of:
0.0026812535 = product of:
0.005362507 = sum of:
0.005362507 = weight(_text_:s in 1746) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005362507 = score(doc=1746,freq=2.0), product of:
0.055801827 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.05132441 = queryNorm
0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 1746, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1746)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.10, S.1404-1405
-
Frandsen, T.F.; Rousseau, R.: Article impact calculated over arbitrary periods (2005)
0.00
0.00100547 = product of:
0.00201094 = sum of:
0.00201094 = product of:
0.00402188 = sum of:
0.00402188 = weight(_text_:s in 3264) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00402188 = score(doc=3264,freq=2.0), product of:
0.055801827 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.05132441 = queryNorm
0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 3264, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3264)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 56(2005) no.1, S.58-62
-
Hu, X.; Rousseau, R.: Do citation chimeras exist? : The case of under-cited influential articles suffering delayed recognition (2019)
0.00
0.00100547 = product of:
0.00201094 = sum of:
0.00201094 = product of:
0.00402188 = sum of:
0.00402188 = weight(_text_:s in 5217) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00402188 = score(doc=5217,freq=2.0), product of:
0.055801827 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.05132441 = queryNorm
0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 5217, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5217)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 70(2019) no.5, S.499-508
