-
Rousseau, R.; Zuccala, A.: ¬A classification of author co-citations : definitions and search strategies (2004)
0.01
0.0121348305 = product of:
0.06067415 = sum of:
0.06067415 = weight(_text_:discuss in 2266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06067415 = score(doc=2266,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20768628 = queryWeight, product of:
5.288358 = idf(docFreq=606, maxDocs=44218)
0.039272353 = queryNorm
0.2921433 = fieldWeight in 2266, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.288358 = idf(docFreq=606, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2266)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- The term author co-citation is defined and classified according to four distinct forms: the pure first-author co-citation, the pure author co-citation, the general author co-citation, and the special co-authorlco-citation. Each form can be used to obtain one count in an author co-citation study, based an a binary counting rule, which either recognizes the co-citedness of two authors in a given reference list (1) or does not (0). Most studies using author co-citations have relied solely an first-author cocitation counts as evidence of an author's oeuvre or body of work contributed to a research field. In this article, we argue that an author's contribution to a selected field of study should not be limited, but should be based an his/her complete list of publications, regardless of author ranking. We discuss the implications associated with using each co-citation form and show where simple first-author co-citations fit within our classification scheme. Examples are given to substantiate each author co-citation form defined in our classification, including a set of sample Dialog(TM) searches using references extracted from the SciSearch database.
-
Rousseau, R.: Timelines in citation research (2006)
0.00
0.0028635524 = product of:
0.014317762 = sum of:
0.014317762 = product of:
0.042953286 = sum of:
0.042953286 = weight(_text_:29 in 1746) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042953286 = score(doc=1746,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13814786 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.039272353 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 1746, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1746)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 18. 8.2006 14:29:40
-
Frandsen, T.F.; Rousseau, R.: Article impact calculated over arbitrary periods (2005)
0.00
0.0021476645 = product of:
0.0107383225 = sum of:
0.0107383225 = product of:
0.032214966 = sum of:
0.032214966 = weight(_text_:29 in 3264) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032214966 = score(doc=3264,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13814786 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.039272353 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 3264, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3264)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 20. 3.2005 10:29:08
-
Ahlgren, P.; Jarneving, B.; Rousseau, R.: Requirements for a cocitation similarity measure, with special reference to Pearson's correlation coefficient (2003)
0.00
0.0014188966 = product of:
0.007094483 = sum of:
0.007094483 = product of:
0.021283448 = sum of:
0.021283448 = weight(_text_:22 in 5171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021283448 = score(doc=5171,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1375251 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.039272353 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5171, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5171)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 9. 7.2006 10:22:35