-
Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: Averaging and globalising quotients of informetric and scientometric data (1996)
0.03
0.031905405 = product of:
0.06381081 = sum of:
0.06381081 = sum of:
0.021194918 = weight(_text_:2 in 7659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021194918 = score(doc=7659,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.05242341 = queryNorm
0.16371232 = fieldWeight in 7659, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7659)
0.04261589 = weight(_text_:22 in 7659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04261589 = score(doc=7659,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18357785 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05242341 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 7659, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7659)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- It is possible, using ISI's Journal Citation Report (JCR), to calculate average impact factors (AIF) for LCR's subject categories but it can be more useful to know the global Impact Factor (GIF) of a subject category and compare the 2 values. Reports results of a study to compare the relationships between AIFs and GIFs of subjects, based on the particular case of the average impact factor of a subfield versus the impact factor of this subfield as a whole, the difference being studied between an average of quotients, denoted as AQ, and a global average, obtained as a quotient of averages, and denoted as GQ. In the case of impact factors, AQ becomes the average impact factor of a field, and GQ becomes its global impact factor. Discusses a number of applications of this technique in the context of informetrics and scientometrics
- Source
- Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.3, S.165-170
-
Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: ¬The influence of publication delays on the observed aging distribution of scientific literature (2000)
0.01
0.014129946 = product of:
0.028259892 = sum of:
0.028259892 = product of:
0.056519784 = sum of:
0.056519784 = weight(_text_:2 in 4385) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056519784 = score(doc=4385,freq=8.0), product of:
0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.05242341 = queryNorm
0.4365662 = fieldWeight in 4385, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4385)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Observed aging curves are influenced by publication delays. In this article, we show how the 'undisturbed' aging function and the publication delay combine to give the observed aging function. This combination is performed by a mathematical operation known as convolution. Examples are given, such as the convolution of 2 Poisson distributions, 2 exponential distributions, a 2 lognormal distributions. A paradox is observed between theory and real data
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 51(2000) no.2, S.158-165
-
Asonuma, A.; Fang, Y.; Rousseau, R.: Reflections on the age distribution of Japanese scientists (2006)
0.01
0.010653973 = product of:
0.021307945 = sum of:
0.021307945 = product of:
0.04261589 = sum of:
0.04261589 = weight(_text_:22 in 5270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04261589 = score(doc=5270,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18357785 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05242341 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5270, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5270)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 15:26:24
-
Rousseau, R.; Jin, B.: ¬The age-dependent h-type AR**2-index : basic properties and a case study (2008)
0.01
0.009177669 = product of:
0.018355338 = sum of:
0.018355338 = product of:
0.036710676 = sum of:
0.036710676 = weight(_text_:2 in 2638) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036710676 = score(doc=2638,freq=6.0), product of:
0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.05242341 = queryNorm
0.28355807 = fieldWeight in 2638, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2638)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Hirsch-type indices are studied with special attention to the AR**2-index introduced by Jin. The article consists of two parts: a theoretical part and a practical illustration. In the theoretical part, we recall the definition of the AR**2-index and show that an alternative definition, the so-called AR**2,1, does not have the properties expected for this type of index. A practical example shows the existence of some of these mathematical properties and illustrates the difference between different h-type indices. Clearly the h-index itself is the most robust of all. It is shown that excluding so-called non-WoS source articles may have a significant influence on the R-and, especially, the g-index.
-
Ahlgren, P.; Jarneving, B.; Rousseau, R.: Requirements for a cocitation similarity measure, with special reference to Pearson's correlation coefficient (2003)
0.01
0.0071026483 = product of:
0.0142052965 = sum of:
0.0142052965 = product of:
0.028410593 = sum of:
0.028410593 = weight(_text_:22 in 5171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028410593 = score(doc=5171,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18357785 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05242341 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5171, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5171)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 9. 7.2006 10:22:35
-
Liu, Y.; Rousseau, R.: Citation analysis and the development of science : a case study using articles by some Nobel prize winners (2014)
0.01
0.007064973 = product of:
0.014129946 = sum of:
0.014129946 = product of:
0.028259892 = sum of:
0.028259892 = weight(_text_:2 in 1197) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028259892 = score(doc=1197,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.05242341 = queryNorm
0.2182831 = fieldWeight in 1197, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1197)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.2, S.281-289
-
Rousseau, R.: Robert Fairthorne and the empirical power laws (2005)
0.01
0.0061818515 = product of:
0.012363703 = sum of:
0.012363703 = product of:
0.024727406 = sum of:
0.024727406 = weight(_text_:2 in 4398) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024727406 = score(doc=4398,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.05242341 = queryNorm
0.19099772 = fieldWeight in 4398, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4398)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of documentation. 61(2005) no.2, S.194-202
-
Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.; Hooydonk, G. van: Methods for accrediting publications to authors or countries : consequences for evaluation studies (2000)
0.01
0.0052987295 = product of:
0.010597459 = sum of:
0.010597459 = product of:
0.021194918 = sum of:
0.021194918 = weight(_text_:2 in 4384) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021194918 = score(doc=4384,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.05242341 = queryNorm
0.16371232 = fieldWeight in 4384, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4384)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 51(2000) no.2, S.145-157
-
Liang, L.; Rousseau, R.: Yield sequences as journal attractivity indicators : "payback times" for Science and Nature (2008)
0.01
0.0052987295 = product of:
0.010597459 = sum of:
0.010597459 = product of:
0.021194918 = sum of:
0.021194918 = weight(_text_:2 in 1737) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021194918 = score(doc=1737,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.05242341 = queryNorm
0.16371232 = fieldWeight in 1737, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1737)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of documentation. 64(2008) no.2, S.229-245
-
Egghe, L.; Guns, R.; Rousseau, R.: Thoughts on uncitedness : Nobel laureates and Fields medalists as case studies (2011)
0.01
0.0052987295 = product of:
0.010597459 = sum of:
0.010597459 = product of:
0.021194918 = sum of:
0.021194918 = weight(_text_:2 in 4994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021194918 = score(doc=4994,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.05242341 = queryNorm
0.16371232 = fieldWeight in 4994, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4994)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Vgl.: Erratum. In: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.2, S.429.
-
Rousseau, S.; Rousseau, R.: Interactions between journal attributes and authors' willingness to wait for editorial decisions (2012)
0.01
0.0052987295 = product of:
0.010597459 = sum of:
0.010597459 = product of:
0.021194918 = sum of:
0.021194918 = weight(_text_:2 in 250) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021194918 = score(doc=250,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.05242341 = queryNorm
0.16371232 = fieldWeight in 250, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=250)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- In this article, we report on a discrete choice experiment to determine the willingness-to-wait (WTW) in the context of journal submissions. Respondents to our survey are mostly active in the information sciences, including librarians. Besides WTW, other attributes included in the study are the quality of the editorial board, the quality of referee reports, the probability of being accepted, the ISI impact factor, and the standing of the journal among peers. Interaction effects originating from scientists' personal characteristics (age, region of origin, motivations to publish) with the WTW are highlighted. A difference was made between submitting a high quality article and a standard article. Among the interesting results obtained from our analysis we mention that for a high-quality article, researchers are willing to wait some 18 months longer for a journal with an ISI impact factor above 2 than for a journal without an impact factor, keeping all other factors constant. For a standard article, the WTW decreases to some 8 months. Gender had no effect on our conclusions.
-
Liu, Y.; Rousseau, R.: Knowledge diffusion through publications and citations : a case study using ESI-fields as unit of diffusion (2010)
0.00
0.004415608 = product of:
0.008831216 = sum of:
0.008831216 = product of:
0.017662432 = sum of:
0.017662432 = weight(_text_:2 in 3334) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017662432 = score(doc=3334,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.05242341 = queryNorm
0.13642694 = fieldWeight in 3334, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3334)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61(2010) no.2, S.340-351
