-
Rousseau, R.; Zuccala, A.: ¬A classification of author co-citations : definitions and search strategies (2004)
0.02
0.021439418 = product of:
0.042878836 = sum of:
0.042878836 = product of:
0.17151535 = sum of:
0.17151535 = weight(_text_:author's in 2266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17151535 = score(doc=2266,freq=4.0), product of:
0.32668847 = queryWeight, product of:
6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
0.048613247 = queryNorm
0.52501196 = fieldWeight in 2266, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2266)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The term author co-citation is defined and classified according to four distinct forms: the pure first-author co-citation, the pure author co-citation, the general author co-citation, and the special co-authorlco-citation. Each form can be used to obtain one count in an author co-citation study, based an a binary counting rule, which either recognizes the co-citedness of two authors in a given reference list (1) or does not (0). Most studies using author co-citations have relied solely an first-author cocitation counts as evidence of an author's oeuvre or body of work contributed to a research field. In this article, we argue that an author's contribution to a selected field of study should not be limited, but should be based an his/her complete list of publications, regardless of author ranking. We discuss the implications associated with using each co-citation form and show where simple first-author co-citations fit within our classification scheme. Examples are given to substantiate each author co-citation form defined in our classification, including a set of sample Dialog(TM) searches using references extracted from the SciSearch database.
-
Asonuma, A.; Fang, Y.; Rousseau, R.: Reflections on the age distribution of Japanese scientists (2006)
0.01
0.009879636 = product of:
0.019759271 = sum of:
0.019759271 = product of:
0.039518543 = sum of:
0.039518543 = weight(_text_:22 in 5270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039518543 = score(doc=5270,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1702353 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.048613247 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5270, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5270)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 15:26:24
-
Ahlgren, P.; Jarneving, B.; Rousseau, R.: Requirements for a cocitation similarity measure, with special reference to Pearson's correlation coefficient (2003)
0.01
0.0065864236 = product of:
0.013172847 = sum of:
0.013172847 = product of:
0.026345694 = sum of:
0.026345694 = weight(_text_:22 in 5171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026345694 = score(doc=5171,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1702353 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.048613247 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5171, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5171)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 9. 7.2006 10:22:35