Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Rousseau, R."
  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Colebunders, R.; Kenyon, C.; Rousseau, R.: Increase in numbers and proportions of review articles in Tropical Medicine, Infectious Diseases, and oncology (2014) 0.00
    0.0012504549 = product of:
      0.028760463 = sum of:
        0.028760463 = sum of:
          0.0094278185 = weight(_text_:1 in 1189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0094278185 = score(doc=1189,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                0.023567878 = queryNorm
              0.16284466 = fieldWeight in 1189, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1189)
          0.019332644 = weight(_text_:29 in 1189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.019332644 = score(doc=1189,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.08290443 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                0.023567878 = queryNorm
              0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 1189, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1189)
      0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    
    Date
    29. 1.2014 15:56:36
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.1, S.201-205
  2. Rousseau, R.; Ding, J.: Does international collaboration yield a higher citation potential for US scientists publishing in highly visible interdisciplinary Journals? (2016) 0.00
    6.2359346E-4 = product of:
      0.01434265 = sum of:
        0.01434265 = product of:
          0.0286853 = sum of:
            0.0286853 = weight(_text_:international in 2860) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0286853 = score(doc=2860,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.078619614 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.36486188 = fieldWeight in 2860, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2860)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    
    Abstract
    Generally, multicountry papers receive more citations than single-country ones. In this contribution, we examine if this rule also applies to American scientists publishing in highly visible interdisciplinary journals. Concretely, we compare the citations received by American scientists in Nature, Science, and the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (PNAS). It is shown that, statistically, American scientists publishing in Nature and Science do not benefit from international collaboration. This statement also holds for communicated submissions, but not for direct and for contributed submissions, to PNAS.
  3. Liu, Y.; Rousseau, R.: Citation analysis and the development of science : a case study using articles by some Nobel prize winners (2014) 0.00
    5.603665E-4 = product of:
      0.012888429 = sum of:
        0.012888429 = product of:
          0.025776858 = sum of:
            0.025776858 = weight(_text_:29 in 1197) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025776858 = score(doc=1197,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08290443 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 1197, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1197)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    
    Date
    29. 1.2014 16:31:35
  4. Shi, D.; Rousseau, R.; Yang, L.; Li, J.: ¬A journal's impact factor is influenced by changes in publication delays of citing journals (2017) 0.00
    4.2027488E-4 = product of:
      0.009666322 = sum of:
        0.009666322 = product of:
          0.019332644 = sum of:
            0.019332644 = weight(_text_:29 in 3441) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.019332644 = score(doc=3441,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08290443 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 3441, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3441)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    
    Date
    16.11.2017 13:29:52
  5. Rousseau, R.; Egghe, L.; Guns, R.: Becoming metric-wise : a bibliometric guide for researchers (2018) 0.00
    3.149623E-4 = product of:
      0.0072441325 = sum of:
        0.0072441325 = product of:
          0.014488265 = sum of:
            0.014488265 = weight(_text_:international in 5226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.014488265 = score(doc=5226,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.078619614 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.18428308 = fieldWeight in 5226, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5226)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    
    Abstract
    Aims to inform researchers about metrics so that they become aware of the evaluative techniques being applied to their scientific output. Understanding these concepts will help them during their funding initiatives, and in hiring and tenure. The book not only describes what indicators do (or are designed to do, which is not always the same thing), but also gives precise mathematical formulae so that indicators can be properly understood and evaluated. Metrics have become a critical issue in science, with widespread international discussion taking place on the subject across scientific journals and organizations. As researchers should know the publication-citation context, the mathematical formulae of indicators being used by evaluating committees and their consequences, and how such indicators might be misused, this book provides an ideal tome on the topic. Provides researchers with a detailed understanding of bibliometric indicators and their applications. Empowers researchers looking to understand the indicators relevant to their work and careers. Presents an informed and rounded picture of bibliometrics, including the strengths and shortcomings of particular indicators. Supplies the mathematics behind bibliometric indicators so they can be properly understood. Written by authors with longstanding expertise who are considered global leaders in the field of bibliometrics