Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Rousseau, R."
  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  1. Rousseau, R.; Zuccala, A.: ¬A classification of author co-citations : definitions and search strategies (2004) 0.02
    0.022563074 = product of:
      0.045126148 = sum of:
        0.045126148 = product of:
          0.18050459 = sum of:
            0.18050459 = weight(_text_:author's in 2266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.18050459 = score(doc=2266,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.34381044 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0511611 = queryNorm
                0.52501196 = fieldWeight in 2266, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2266)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The term author co-citation is defined and classified according to four distinct forms: the pure first-author co-citation, the pure author co-citation, the general author co-citation, and the special co-authorlco-citation. Each form can be used to obtain one count in an author co-citation study, based an a binary counting rule, which either recognizes the co-citedness of two authors in a given reference list (1) or does not (0). Most studies using author co-citations have relied solely an first-author cocitation counts as evidence of an author's oeuvre or body of work contributed to a research field. In this article, we argue that an author's contribution to a selected field of study should not be limited, but should be based an his/her complete list of publications, regardless of author ranking. We discuss the implications associated with using each co-citation form and show where simple first-author co-citations fit within our classification scheme. Examples are given to substantiate each author co-citation form defined in our classification, including a set of sample Dialog(TM) searches using references extracted from the SciSearch database.
  2. Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: Averaging and globalising quotients of informetric and scientometric data (1996) 0.01
    0.010397433 = product of:
      0.020794867 = sum of:
        0.020794867 = product of:
          0.041589733 = sum of:
            0.041589733 = weight(_text_:22 in 7659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041589733 = score(doc=7659,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17915745 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0511611 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 7659, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7659)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.3, S.165-170
  3. Asonuma, A.; Fang, Y.; Rousseau, R.: Reflections on the age distribution of Japanese scientists (2006) 0.01
    0.010397433 = product of:
      0.020794867 = sum of:
        0.020794867 = product of:
          0.041589733 = sum of:
            0.041589733 = weight(_text_:22 in 5270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041589733 = score(doc=5270,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17915745 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0511611 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5270, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5270)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:26:24
  4. Ahlgren, P.; Jarneving, B.; Rousseau, R.: Requirements for a cocitation similarity measure, with special reference to Pearson's correlation coefficient (2003) 0.01
    0.0069316225 = product of:
      0.013863245 = sum of:
        0.013863245 = product of:
          0.02772649 = sum of:
            0.02772649 = weight(_text_:22 in 5171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02772649 = score(doc=5171,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17915745 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0511611 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5171, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5171)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    9. 7.2006 10:22:35
  5. Shi, D.; Rousseau, R.; Yang, L.; Li, J.: ¬A journal's impact factor is influenced by changes in publication delays of citing journals (2017) 0.00
    0.0030604464 = product of:
      0.0061208927 = sum of:
        0.0061208927 = product of:
          0.012241785 = sum of:
            0.012241785 = weight(_text_:d in 3441) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.012241785 = score(doc=3441,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09719954 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0511611 = queryNorm
                0.1259449 = fieldWeight in 3441, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3441)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)