Search (6 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Rousseau, R."
  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  1. Rousseau, R.; Zuccala, A.: ¬A classification of author co-citations : definitions and search strategies (2004) 0.01
    0.009279098 = product of:
      0.018558197 = sum of:
        0.018558197 = product of:
          0.12990737 = sum of:
            0.12990737 = weight(_text_:author's in 2266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12990737 = score(doc=2266,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.24743699 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03682014 = queryNorm
                0.52501196 = fieldWeight in 2266, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2266)
          0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The term author co-citation is defined and classified according to four distinct forms: the pure first-author co-citation, the pure author co-citation, the general author co-citation, and the special co-authorlco-citation. Each form can be used to obtain one count in an author co-citation study, based an a binary counting rule, which either recognizes the co-citedness of two authors in a given reference list (1) or does not (0). Most studies using author co-citations have relied solely an first-author cocitation counts as evidence of an author's oeuvre or body of work contributed to a research field. In this article, we argue that an author's contribution to a selected field of study should not be limited, but should be based an his/her complete list of publications, regardless of author ranking. We discuss the implications associated with using each co-citation form and show where simple first-author co-citations fit within our classification scheme. Examples are given to substantiate each author co-citation form defined in our classification, including a set of sample Dialog(TM) searches using references extracted from the SciSearch database.
  2. Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: Averaging and globalising quotients of informetric and scientometric data (1996) 0.01
    0.0074829306 = product of:
      0.014965861 = sum of:
        0.014965861 = product of:
          0.029931722 = sum of:
            0.029931722 = weight(_text_:22 in 7659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029931722 = score(doc=7659,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12893786 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03682014 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 7659, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7659)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.3, S.165-170
  3. Asonuma, A.; Fang, Y.; Rousseau, R.: Reflections on the age distribution of Japanese scientists (2006) 0.01
    0.0074829306 = product of:
      0.014965861 = sum of:
        0.014965861 = product of:
          0.029931722 = sum of:
            0.029931722 = weight(_text_:22 in 5270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029931722 = score(doc=5270,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12893786 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03682014 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5270, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5270)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:26:24
  4. Ahlgren, P.; Jarneving, B.; Rousseau, R.: Requirements for a cocitation similarity measure, with special reference to Pearson's correlation coefficient (2003) 0.00
    0.0049886205 = product of:
      0.009977241 = sum of:
        0.009977241 = product of:
          0.019954482 = sum of:
            0.019954482 = weight(_text_:22 in 5171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.019954482 = score(doc=5171,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12893786 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03682014 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5171, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5171)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    9. 7.2006 10:22:35
  5. Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: Introduction to informetrics : quantitative methods in library, documentation and information science (1990) 0.00
    0.0044084494 = product of:
      0.008816899 = sum of:
        0.008816899 = product of:
          0.017633798 = sum of:
            0.017633798 = weight(_text_:m in 1515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.017633798 = score(doc=1515,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09162503 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03682014 = queryNorm
                0.19245613 = fieldWeight in 1515, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1515)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    m
  6. Rousseau, R.; Egghe, L.; Guns, R.: Becoming metric-wise : a bibliometric guide for researchers (2018) 0.00
    0.0031488927 = product of:
      0.0062977853 = sum of:
        0.0062977853 = product of:
          0.012595571 = sum of:
            0.012595571 = weight(_text_:m in 5226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.012595571 = score(doc=5226,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09162503 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03682014 = queryNorm
                0.13746867 = fieldWeight in 5226, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5226)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    m