Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

Rousseau, R.; Zuccala, A.: ¬A classification of author co-citations : definitions and search strategies (2004) 0.02
```
0.021196617 = product of:
  0.042393234 = sum of:
    0.042393234 = product of:
      0.16957293 = sum of:
        0.16957293 = weight(_text_:author's in 2266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16957293 = score(doc=2266,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.32298872 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0480627 = queryNorm
            0.52501196 = fieldWeight in 2266, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2266)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
```
Abstract

The term author co-citation is defined and classified according to four distinct forms: the pure first-author co-citation, the pure author co-citation, the general author co-citation, and the special co-authorlco-citation. Each form can be used to obtain one count in an author co-citation study, based an a binary counting rule, which either recognizes the co-citedness of two authors in a given reference list (1) or does not (0). Most studies using author co-citations have relied solely an first-author cocitation counts as evidence of an author's oeuvre or body of work contributed to a research field. In this article, we argue that an author's contribution to a selected field of study should not be limited, but should be based an his/her complete list of publications, regardless of author ranking. We discuss the implications associated with using each co-citation form and show where simple first-author co-citations fit within our classification scheme. Examples are given to substantiate each author co-citation form defined in our classification, including a set of sample Dialog(TM) searches using references extracted from the SciSearch database.

Asonuma, A.; Fang, Y.; Rousseau, R.: Reflections on the age distribution of Japanese scientists (2006) 0.01

0.009767748 = product of:
  0.019535497 = sum of:
    0.019535497 = product of:
      0.039070994 = sum of:
        0.039070994 = weight(_text_:22 in 5270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.039070994 = score(doc=5270,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1683074 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0480627 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5270, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5270)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date: 22. 7.2006 15:26:24

Ahlgren, P.; Jarneving, B.; Rousseau, R.: Requirements for a cocitation similarity measure, with special reference to Pearson's correlation coefficient (2003) 0.01

0.0065118326 = product of:
  0.013023665 = sum of:
    0.013023665 = product of:
      0.02604733 = sum of:
        0.02604733 = weight(_text_:22 in 5171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02604733 = score(doc=5171,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1683074 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0480627 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5171, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5171)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date: 9. 7.2006 10:22:35

Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

Authors

Themes